It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What relevance has the guy having kids or not? He's discussing how to evade a urine test for pot at work, not what he teaches his children. I do lots of stuff I never told my son about when he was a child.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: SRPrime
originally posted by: Abbby
a reply to: TinySickTears
Not sure how Tony carries fake piss around, the specimen cups have a temperature indicator strip along the side that has to be in a certain range, something impossible to fake if carried outside the body
Absolutely not. They come with warming packs that take 30 minutes to reach the appropriate temperature. If you forgo the warming pack, all you have to do is tuck it into your waste band and it will get to the correct temperature.
Super easy, has always worked for me.
Drug tests are dumb because they only cost 35$ to pass.
correct
thats why i said it is little more than an annoyance.
keeping in hand warmers gets old.
Do you have kids? Please say you don't.
What’s even crazier is if a serious alcoholic avoids drinking for work, he will have extreme withdrawal shakes that could diversely effect the safety on his job site
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: generik
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: KansasGirl
REPLY TO OP (why didn't it show which post I'm resoonding to? 😡):
I'm not one to talk from way high up on a horse, dude: I am an UBER alcoholic. I checked myself into the ER once- meaning I walked myself in and talked to the nurses and filled out my own paperwork, etc..and my BAC was .49. Yes, you read that correctly.
I drank on the job, once my alcoholism got out of control. I would put vodka in with some Gatorade so it looked like I just had Gatorade, but it was not just gatoroade. That was the only way I could get through the day without shaking so much that I couldn't hold anything, or without puking. The hardest thing, in the morning, was to get three or four shots of vodka down without puking it up. If I could keep it down, he shakes would stop in about 20 minutes and I wouldn't be in danger of puking with every move of my eyes.
If I had been tested at work, I would have blown over the limit, and yes, I drove myself to work. When I finally got some help and checked into Detox, I hadn't had a drink for over twelve hours and my BAC was .28. Keep in mind I hadn't had a drop in half a day, so imagine what my levels were when I was sipping my "Gatorade" at work. And here is the worst part: I was working WITH KIDS.
So, I am not on a high horse. I was the worst of the worst.
About the job thing: I lost my dream job because of my drinking. The situation I descobed so far, that was my SECOND rendezvous with being a drunk. Before that, I had been in my dream job- went to rehab, and when I "relapsed" a month later, I got fired. Was it maybe a tad unfair, since it usuly takes a person a year of starts and stops to get sober? Yeah, maybe it was a bit harsh, but it was their decision, and no one forced me to drink gallons of vodka every night by myself in my living room.
So: I know it sucks, but when we are the employees, we have to follow their rules. And honestly, having no THC in your system while at work, it's really not a bad rule.
I had to grow up that way, so I feel I can say I think you need to grow up in this area. Worst of the worst right here, man. I'm sure you've not been as irresponsible and immature as I was, but you probably could straighten up a little.
Stop talking about pot and THC as you are utterly clueless about. The only thing worse than a drunk is a drunk that thinks they know everything about pot and pot testing.
In other words zip it until you educate yourself.
What did I get wrong? Do they not test for THC levels? If that's thhe case, then please forgive me, and correct me. What did I get wrong? I thought that's what they test for, but I have no problem being corrected.
if they tested for levels of THC, then it would be a different story. but they are not testing to see if you are stoned while working at all. what they are testing and thus firing people over is whether they have used the drug at all, period, end of story. so it would have been like if you never drank before or while working, and were in fact stone cold sober at work, yet they tested you to see if you drank at all, and fired you because you drank after work. and as mentioned marijuana will show a positive weeks after being exposed to it. so if you were say at a New Years party where some people were smoking up inside for example. and you of course breathed some in. then you got hit with a random drug test on Feb 1, you would still likely show up as positive for using marijuana, and thus loose your job.
So they DO test for THC. Which is all I said, and which is what you so rudely and immaturely accused me of "thinking I know everything about pot and pot testing" for. Your reading comprehension and logic skills need brushing up on. Can't wait to see your sweet response to this one!
About breathing in some air around people who are smoking weed: really, if you were around some (dopey) smokers on New Year's, would you really still have traceable amounts of it in your system an entire month later? From breathing the air at a party with potheads?
Also: I think you meant to say you would LOSE your job, not "loose" it. You can't "loose" a job.
What did I get wrong? Do they not test for THC levels? If that's thhe case, then please forgive me, and correct me. What did I get wrong? I thought that's what they test for, but I have no problem being corrected.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
Do you have kids? Please say you don't.
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
What relevance has the guy having kids or not? He's discussing how to evade a urine test for pot at work, not what he teaches his children. I do lots of stuff I never told my son about when he was a child.
Don't make too many assumptions about jargon. After some 45 years of research, that's the first time I've heard the word 'burner' applied to somebody who tokes. Just sayin, eh?
originally posted by: TinySickTears
what do you think a burner is Occam?
no context clues?
its someone who smokes grass man
originally posted by: Fools
What people do in their own time is their own business. Companies that want to peer into private lives are not companies worth working for.
originally posted by: openedeyesandears
I hadn't heard of a "burner" either... and I've been around. New generation, new terms I guess
Consider it a regional term, and move along.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: openedeyesandears
I hadn't heard of a "burner" either... and I've been around. New generation, new terms I guess
Im 40
Not young generation
Dad used to say it too
originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck
Consider it a regional term, and move along.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: openedeyesandears
I hadn't heard of a "burner" either... and I've been around. New generation, new terms I guess
Im 40
Not young generation
Dad used to say it too
originally posted by: openedeyesandears
Hmm, so now that it's legal to consume here in Canada, are the companies still testing for pot PRIOR to hiring like they did before legalization? And if so, how? A piss test? Swab?
originally posted by: openedeyesandears
Hmm, so now that it's legal to consume here in Canada, are the companies still testing for pot PRIOR to hiring like they did before legalization? And if so, how? A piss test? Swab?