It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
as posted by soficrow
Really seekerof - you need to read the article at least, if not the links. As a mod, you should at least pretend to adhere to ATS principles.
"On top of threatening airspace invasion, it turns out that the USA has never informed Canada what the controversial missile defense system actually entails. Bush is bullying Canada to sign a blank contract."
Originally posted by soficrow
I was joking around with masqua - not making assertions. Context is relevant.
And FYI - I don't have a "spiel." Quit trying to pick fights with me - you're a mod not a troll. Get one of your lapdogs to do it. Looks better that way.
as posted by interpid
Seeker, you have to admit, signing something and getting the details later is not good business, let alone politically smart?
Originally posted by Seekerof
as posted by soficrow
I was joking around with masqua - not making assertions. Context is relevant.
And FYI - I don't have a "spiel." Quit trying to pick fights with me - you're a mod not a troll. Get one of your lapdogs to do it. Looks better that way.
i simply see it as directed communication, all in the name of debate and contestation.
seekerof
Originally posted by soficrow
Sounds like pure ungulate shiite to me.
Originally posted by Seekerof
as posted by interpid
Seeker, you have to admit, signing something and getting the details later is not good business, let alone politically smart?
I would agree if that was the case. One source (presented by soficrow) out of many to be had, does not fully make me believe that Mr. Martin was not informed of such possible "airspace violations" as a result of not signing on to the program.
seekerof
We are not talking about launches from the equator though, are we? Yes or no- would Russia launch an eastbound strike into Alaska? And by the way, if yo are arguing here that the launch would not come over the pole, then you should be taking that up with others arguing for the shield in Canada.
Originally posted by FredTThe flight paths of ICBM's are a bit more complicated that. And paths also have to be computed based on the sheer mechanics of getting them where you want to go. You have to factor in launch point etc etc. An object launched at the equator requires less energy for a given payload that a launch at higher latitudes. Thats why Boeing invented SeaLaunch (using a Russian booster) to float its launch pad at the equator then return home after.
Hard to mistake allied fighters as well apparently, result-failure! Hard to have a visual of, as well as mapped positions of allied positions and determine they were the enemy too, result- failure!
Cute but not really relevant, hard to mistake a 17,000 mph inbound with a Cessna eh? Planes do not fly that fast yet and most do not flyin a balistic path through space with a point of oragin being some rouge country
as posted by soficrow
Debate and contestation? Really? Then why pick a single playful exchange when you could have addressed the article or any number of serious points.
Sounds like pure ungulate shiite to me.
Originally posted by soficrow
Bush has destroyed the USA economically and socially. He has driven this once beautiful nation straight into the ground. God willing, he won't do the same to the rest of the world.
as posted by Marg
I am going just to add one thing to this otherwise good thread, the participation of some mods while I enjoy very much and welcome all the time, in some other cases is becoming a contest of wills.
Somebody needs to give up before this become ridiculous and that is what is going on in here right now.
Stop the bickering and give up. Putting Soficrow down on her threads and views is a low blow taking in consideration that she does an excellent job in ATS and her threads are very popular.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Yes, 'mini-mod' Marg.
I would agree.
Thus I am abstaining from commenting further to this topic thread and any like type to it.
I have contributed nothing to this topic, at all.
Thank you for your astute observations and correcting me on this.
*This message will self-destruct in 5-----4------3------2-----*
seekerof
Originally posted by soficrow
Bush is pressuring Canada to sign an open-ended agreement for his controversial Star Wars missile defense plan, but refuses to provide any actual information or details about the plan.
..............................
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
Originally posted by soficrow
Bush has destroyed the USA economically and socially. He has driven this once beautiful nation straight into the ground. God willing, he won't do the same to the rest of the world.
Sorry, sofi,
I must disagree with you here. Our country began it's downward spiral on November 22, 1963. Some would say that is the day our country was taken out of the hands ot its citizens.
The US has been declining for years...and years. Some are just now beginning to notice it seems.
I have to say it's not fair to blame Bush for what has happened economically and socially to this country unless you want to blame all the other Presidents from LBJ onward.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by soficrow
Bush is pressuring Canada to sign an open-ended agreement for his controversial Star Wars missile defense plan, but refuses to provide any actual information or details about the plan.
..............................
Soficrow, all of your articles are always biased agaisnt the US....all of them.....and this one is nothing new or different about your past threads...
I find it ironic that you keep trying to push your agenda that the president of the US is this evil man who is a dictator....Weren't you the one who said about 7 months ago that you are in favor of "a benevolent dictatorship"?....