It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Japanese Spacecraft Found Concrete Block on Asteroid.

page: 5
9
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 04:07 AM
link   
Huge rock on asteroid: www.flickr.com...

edit on 4-10-2018 by FossilLin because: to fix mistake




posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 08:32 AM
link   
"The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) announced on February 2 that it was found that moisture is not contained in the rocks on the surface at the asteroid "Ryugu" which the explorer "Hayabusa 2" is investigating. Many carbon-rich "C type asteroids" like ryugu were known to contain moisture in rocks, and were expected to have all the materials of life. It is unclear whether the ryugu was originally free from moisture or evaporated by sunlight."
The above quoted from tellerreport.com...

"C-type (carbonaceous) asteroids are the most common variety, forming around 75% of known asteroids.[1] "
Quoted from en.wikipedia.org...

"C-type asteroids are correlated with Carbonaceous chondrite meteorites"
Quoted from astronomy.stackexchange.com...

Meteorite Murchison is a carbonaceous chondrite meteorite, according to
en.wikipedia.org...

Conclusion: Since asteroid Ryugu originated from Mars, Murchison meteorite should also have originated from Mars, because Murchison meteorite came form C-type asteroid and Ryugu asteroid is a C-type asteroid originating from Mars as evidenced by its artifacts made by Martians.

edit on 4-10-2018 by FossilLin because: to give more details

edit on 4-10-2018 by FossilLin because: to make conclusion



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 08:41 AM
link   
a reply to: FossilLin

I meant only the photos in twitter.com... are possibly fakes.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 09:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: FossilLin

Conclusion: Since asteroid Ryugu originated from Mars,


citation needed


Murchison meteorite should also have originated from Mars,


Even of true, this does not automatically follow.


because Murchison meteorite came form C-type asteroid and Ryugu asteroid is a C-type asteroid originating from Mars as evidenced by its artifacts made by Martians.


And then you jumped the shark.



posted on Oct, 4 2018 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo

originally posted by: FossilLin

Conclusion: Since asteroid Ryugu originated from Mars,


citation needed


Murchison meteorite should also have originated from Mars,


Even of true, this does not automatically follow.


because Murchison meteorite came form C-type asteroid and Ryugu asteroid is a C-type asteroid originating from Mars as evidenced by its artifacts made by Martians.


And then you jumped the shark.

You mean 75% of asteroids aren’t from mars?!?!? Now you’ve gone too far sir!!



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 01:56 AM
link   
Most Asteroids and Most Meteorites Originated from Mars.

Asteroid Ryugu is a C-type asteroid (note 1).
"C-type (carbonaceous) asteroids are the most common variety, forming around 75% of known asteroids.[1] " Quoted from en.wikipedia.org...
Asteroid Ryugu originated from Mars, as it has Martian artifacts (note 2).

C-type asteroids are of similar chemical composition. So, they probably originated from the same source. As asteroid Ryugu originated from Mars, C-type asteroids probably originated from Mars, too. As C-type asteroids account for 75% of all asteroids, most asteroids may have originated from Mars. As most asteroids may have originated from Mars, most meteors and meteorites may have originated from Mars. Anyway, Most meteorites contain ET fossils (note 3).

Note 1: see tellerreport.com...
Note 2: see wretchfossil.blogspot.com...
Note 3: wretchfossil.blogspot.com...



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 02:02 AM
link   
Asteroid Ryugu Exposes Astronomy Error.
One of many astronomy errors: astronomers say asteroids were formed with material left from formation of our solar system.

Error exposed: asteroid Ryugu shows a landscape with huge rocks, sedimentary rocks, artifacts, none of which is the "primitive" material left from formation of our solar system.

Evidence: 1. Artifacts Found on Asteroid (see post above)
2. Asteroid Ryugu Shows Most Meteorites Originated from Mars. (see post above)
3. Most meteorites contain ET fossils. (see post above)



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 02:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Archivalist

Most people do not accept most of my finds.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 02:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: FossilLin
Most Asteroids and Most Meteorites Originated from Mars.

Asteroid Ryugu is a C-type asteroid (note 1).
"C-type (carbonaceous) asteroids are the most common variety, forming around 75% of known asteroids.[1] " Quoted from en.wikipedia.org...
Asteroid Ryugu originated from Mars, as it has Martian artifacts (note 2).

C-type asteroids are of similar chemical composition. So, they probably originated from the same source. As asteroid Ryugu originated from Mars, C-type asteroids probably originated from Mars, too. As C-type asteroids account for 75% of all asteroids, most asteroids may have originated from Mars. As most asteroids may have originated from Mars, most meteors and meteorites may have originated from Mars. Anyway, Most meteorites contain ET fossils (note 3).

Note 1: see tellerreport.com...
Note 2: see wretchfossil.blogspot.com...
Note 3: wretchfossil.blogspot.com...


Repeating the same nonsense in a different order does not stop it being nonsense. You have no evidence that Ryugu is Martian in origin. Citing your own blog is not the same as citing evidence because your blog is full of circular logic and self-referential, ludicrous, non-sequitur conclusions. There are no ET artifacts anywhere on that asteroid or any other. You can't just proclaim that something is from Mars because it has Martian artifacts on it as if it was true because it absolutely is not.

You need to provide the sources for your claims you make in your blog here, not use this forum as clickbait. If you have no sources other than your blog, then it becomes obvious that you are just making it up.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 02:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: FossilLin
a reply to: Archivalist

Most people do not accept most of my finds.


No-one accepts any of your finds.



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: FossilLin

Asteroid Ryugu Exposes Astronomy Error.
One of many astronomy errors: astronomers say asteroids were formed with material left from formation of our solar system.

Error exposed: asteroid Ryugu shows a landscape with huge rocks, sedimentary rocks, artifacts, none of which is the "primitive" material left from formation of our solar system.


It seems to me (just looking at this logically) that we could get large boulders on an asteroid this way:

(1) The leftover stuff from the formation of the planets includes asteroids formed from the dust that came from that primordial dust. Then....

(2) Some of these smaller asteroidal groupings of dust collided, sometimes with enough kinetic energy to make the material molten, which would then cool again into harder, rocky, maybe crystalline materials.

(3) Those harder rocky asteroids might then have other collisions, maybe some of those collisions just being "glancing blows" that causes boulder-sized hard rocks (and smaller whole rocks) to break off of the asteroids, which then....

(4) Might be captured by the gravity of another asteroid, and fall onto the surface of that asteroid.


Under that scenario (again, just looking at it from a layman's point of view), I can see how it would be plausible that large rocks might exist on an asteroid that was never part of a planet, but instead just be built from the leftover pieces from the formation of the solar system.

Is there something in your mind that makes this scenario so implausible that the only other answer is that asteroids that contain large rocks must have once been part of a planet like Mars?


In response to your point about sedimentary rocks, I don't think the images of what you claim are sedimentary rocks clearly show sedimentary rocks.


edit on 2018/10/5 by Box of Rain because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 5 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Asteroid trash:



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:32 AM
link   
The following is an image that is not officially published:
www.flickr.com...
Green square marks a large photo. The color of the photo resembles that of twitter.com...
So, maybe Tobacco Rat in the link above did not fake the photo after all.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Blue Shift
Asteroid trash:

You sir have much more time on your hands than me and quite the active imagination.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: FossilLin
You mean the rock?


I'd like to see Dwayne Johnson in a tough-guy space movie!



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: FossilLin
You mean the rock?


I'd like to see Dwayne Johnson in a tough-guy space movie!


Please tell me it wasn’t doom, god that was an awful movie....



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 02:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Box of Rain

You did not explain the artifacts, the sedimentary rock, or the many huge rocks on asteroid Ryugu.
Your collision scenario is a theory, which is a dime a dozen.
The asteroid is unlike other asteroids in that it has no water in its rocks.
"Primitive" material was tiny particles when the material was said to be left over from formation of planets, which were said to have formed from particles. Those particles did not form huge rocks on the asteroid.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 04:43 AM
link   
a reply to: FossilLin
Huge rocks impacting the asteroid will produce large craters and then bounce off the asteroid.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 04:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: FossilLin
a reply to: Box of Rain

You did not explain the artifacts, the sedimentary rock, or the many huge rocks on asteroid Ryugu.


Neither do you, apart from making a bare assertion without evidence that there is a sedimentary rock.



Your collision scenario is a theory, which is a dime a dozen.


It is a theory that makes sense, unlike yours.



The asteroid is unlike other asteroids in that it has no water in its rocks.


Citation required. You need to give a source that states unequivocally that all asteroids contain water.



"Primitive" material was tiny particles when the material was said to be left over from formation of planets, which were said to have formed from particles. Those particles did not form huge rocks on the asteroid.


They can form the matrix within which large rocks can become embedded on impact.

Got any evidence that this asteroid is from Mars yet? Proper evidence, not your blog.



posted on Oct, 6 2018 @ 05:05 AM
link   
a reply to: FossilLin

Deleted - I was incorrect, here is the image on the MASCOT twitter feed

twitter.com...

Tobacco Rat still has not provided a source, however.
edit on 6/10/2018 by OneBigMonkeyToo because: Correction



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join