Defamation of Character -Kavanaugh

a reply to: carewemust

and, how do you know her political mindset??
more rumors???

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: shooterbrody

Glad you linked it for everyone to see. So first he categorically denies the accusation (your quote) and then later to Grassley he tells him he was never even at that party (which, as I said above, is weird considering there was almost no information to corroborate 'which' party it was).

Not real hard to figure out it wasnt at any party if the incident never happened.

She is about to gain a lot of attention in a very unwanted way.

a reply to: Wayfarer

I linked what you posted,
I did not link the rumor I passed on.
There has been very little actual "information" and a lot of speculation and third had accounts of what people are reportedly saying.
no different than the rumor I submitted that caused your discomfort.

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: carewemust

and, how do you know her political mindset??
more rumors???

It isnt hard after seeing the picture if her with a vagina hat on.....

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Xtrozero

Or maybe she's telling the truth. Its not uncommon for those who've been sexually assaulted to wait a long time before coming forward (on account of the trauma).



The worst case is Kavanaugh's nomination gets railroaded because of this, and he stays at the top of the second highest court in the land. Is that any worse than Garland's similar treatment and fate for the crime of being nominated a Democrat?

Yes by a long shot, and I was outraged over what happened to garland.

Using allegations of sexual abuse to derail a political opponent is has all of the downside of what happened to garland, in addition to smearing a man for the rest of his life, and helping discredit every real victim of sexual abuse out there.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: shooterbrody

Kavanaugh's Spokesperson commenting that it was just 'Horseplay'

Kavanaugh's earlier denials of assault and being at the party

Guessing you either didnt watch those videos or linked to the wrong one? Both state that he denies ever being there. The ladies talking in the first one are talking solely about the letter, not any statement that any of it is true....

I think you're just embarrasing yourself now, from the same article, "According to an NBC reporter, Kavanaugh is now expanding the scope of his denial, telling Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch he was never at the party in question."

Even in the video his "spokesperson" said he says he was never there.

The embarrassment will be all over the accuser soon. She is about to be outed as the liar she is.

You're not getting it. His spokesperson said he was never there, and then spends time explaining why it was horseplay that and that isn't a crime. Its a weird juxtaposition to claim to not have committed a crime and also to (through a spokesperson) try to explain that it wasn't even a crime anyways.

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Xtrozero

Or maybe she's telling the truth. Its not uncommon for those who've been sexually assaulted to wait a long time before coming forward (on account of the trauma).



The worst case is Kavanaugh's nomination gets railroaded because of this, and he stays at the top of the second highest court in the land. Is that any worse than Garland's similar treatment and fate for the crime of being nominated a Democrat?

How many hands does Kavanaugh have? He pushed her into a room and on to a bed, he then held her down and with another hand smothered her mouth and with a third or forth hand tried to remove her clothing.

To actually have all this quickly stop as his friend Judge jumped on both of them laughing as she then got up and left the room. No clothing was ever removed, no mention that he touched her breast, private areas or even tried to kiss her...

I'm trying to see the sexual assault in any of this...

a reply to: Wayfarer

Where’s the proof? We’re supposed to believe some lady from 40 yrs ago that can’t remember anything about the “incident.” Not only that but waits until the week of his a confirmation. The Dems are complete trash for exploiting this poor,deranged woman.

a reply to: Vasa Croe
haven't seen the picture... but are you sure it is her, or is this like misidentifying the charlottesville driver and sicking the lunatics on a innocent family forcing them to go into hiding because of the threats they got??
just wondering here.... since those internet wannabe investigators do tend to make mistakes often!!

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Xtrozero

Or maybe she's telling the truth. Its not uncommon for those who've been sexually assaulted to wait a long time before coming forward (on account of the trauma).



The worst case is Kavanaugh's nomination gets railroaded because of this, and he stays at the top of the second highest court in the land. Is that any worse than Garland's similar treatment and fate for the crime of being nominated a Democrat?

How many hands does Kavanaugh have? He pushed her into a room and on to a bed, he then held her down and with another hand smothered her mouth and with a third or forth hand tried to remove her clothing.

To actually have all this quickly stop as his friend Judge jumped on both of them laughing as she then got up and left the room. No clothing was ever removed, no mention that he touched her breast, private areas or even tried to kiss her...

I'm trying to see the sexual assault in any of this...

Uh, holy crap man. I think you need to check out the definition of sexual assault Here

Trying to remove clothing is pretty black and white in this regard.

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: shooterbrody

Kavanaugh's Spokesperson commenting that it was just 'Horseplay'

Kavanaugh's earlier denials of assault and being at the party

Guessing you either didnt watch those videos or linked to the wrong one? Both state that he denies ever being there. The ladies talking in the first one are talking solely about the letter, not any statement that any of it is true....

I think you're just embarrasing yourself now, from the same article, "According to an NBC reporter, Kavanaugh is now expanding the scope of his denial, telling Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch he was never at the party in question."

Even in the video his "spokesperson" said he says he was never there.

The embarrassment will be all over the accuser soon. She is about to be outed as the liar she is.

You're not getting it. His spokesperson said he was never there, and then spends time explaining why it was horseplay that and that isn't a crime. Its a weird juxtaposition to claim to not have committed a crime and also to (through a spokesperson) try to explain that it wasn't even a crime anyways.

Oh...I am definitely getting it. They are talking about the content of the letter which apparently could be taken in many ways. She isnt saying he was there and it was horseplay, which it seems you have decided is the case.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Xtrozero

Or maybe she's telling the truth. Its not uncommon for those who've been sexually assaulted to wait a long time before coming forward (on account of the trauma).



The worst case is Kavanaugh's nomination gets railroaded because of this, and he stays at the top of the second highest court in the land. Is that any worse than Garland's similar treatment and fate for the crime of being nominated a Democrat?

How many hands does Kavanaugh have? He pushed her into a room and on to a bed, he then held her down and with another hand smothered her mouth and with a third or forth hand tried to remove her clothing.

To actually have all this quickly stop as his friend Judge jumped on both of them laughing as she then got up and left the room. No clothing was ever removed, no mention that he touched her breast, private areas or even tried to kiss her...

I'm trying to see the sexual assault in any of this...

I think that qualifies as assault sexual or not.

www.law.cornell.edu...

a reply to: Wayfarer

Trying to remove clothing is pretty black and white in this regard.

says who?

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: shooterbrody

Kavanaugh's Spokesperson commenting that it was just 'Horseplay'

Kavanaugh's earlier denials of assault and being at the party

Guessing you either didnt watch those videos or linked to the wrong one? Both state that he denies ever being there. The ladies talking in the first one are talking solely about the letter, not any statement that any of it is true....

I think you're just embarrasing yourself now, from the same article, "According to an NBC reporter, Kavanaugh is now expanding the scope of his denial, telling Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch he was never at the party in question."

Even in the video his "spokesperson" said he says he was never there.

The embarrassment will be all over the accuser soon. She is about to be outed as the liar she is.

You're not getting it. His spokesperson said he was never there, and then spends time explaining why it was horseplay that and that isn't a crime. Its a weird juxtaposition to claim to not have committed a crime and also to (through a spokesperson) try to explain that it wasn't even a crime anyways.

No I think you are not understanding properly.

First, I see no proof this is a spokesperson, merely someone who supports his confirmation.

Where is your proof she is speaking on behalf of kavanaugh?

Secondly, she is not suggesting at any point that kavanaugh was there when discussing horse play; she is merely making the reasonable point that this womans story could be interpreted many ways, especially given the large time frame that has passed.

I think that you are terribly mistaken to try to use this comment as proof that kavanaugh is changing his story.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: shooterbrody

Glad you linked it for everyone to see. So first he categorically denies the accusation (your quote) and then later to Grassley he tells him he was never even at that party (which, as I said above, is weird considering there was almost no information to corroborate 'which' party it was).

Not real hard to figure out it wasnt at any party if the incident never happened.

She is about to gain a lot of attention in a very unwanted way.

But easy to figure out if it did happen.

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Vasa Croe
haven't seen the picture... but are you sure it is her, or is this like misidentifying the charlottesville driver and sicking the lunatics on a innocent family forcing them to go into hiding because of the threats they got??
just wondering here.... since those internet wannabe investigators do tend to make mistakes often!!

It is definitely her.....



And there are articles written about her being at the March at the time of it.

article

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Wayfarer

Trying to remove clothing is pretty black and white in this regard.

says who?

Uh, everyone who's not a troglodyte: Here

Also Here

www.cnn.com...
a "supposed" copy of the letter per cnn with "redactions"

CNN was not provided a copy of the letter sent to Feinstein, but a source who had the letter read the contents of a redacted version to CNN.

The source in Feinsteins office must be a gop plant. Otherwise the good people of the dnc would have kept this confidential until the lady was called to testify.

a reply to: Wayfarer

of course you left out the accuseds account or the accusers account as well cause they dont matter

oh and as for the laws you sited...you left out a relevant part.....but I have no doubt you know that

a reply to: Vasa Croe

got another article that link won't let me in unless I either subscribe or turn off my ad blocker...
lol... some type of software glitch has made it so I can't selectively turn off my ad blocker and I would need someone more puter savy than me to spend an unacceptable amount of time figuring how to turn it off, and then having to screw around with it again to turn it back on..