Lobbyist pleads guilty of steering foreign money to Trump inaugural

a reply to: annoyedpharmacist
that idea was based on the fallacy that mueller would rush things to meet the imaginary Sept. 1 deadline.
well, maybe mueller doesn't accept that fallacy and just isn't gonna rush things.

This was the big bombshell of the week according to MSNBC

🤧

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others

He was convicted of not telling people he worked for a foreign government. Is there any evidence that Trump would have hired him and Manafort if they were registered? Would it even have been illegal if he hired them anyways?

a reply to: DJW001

At least he presents FACTS, alternate or not, factual is factual. Mueller has yet to present anything other than he said and WE SAY HE SAID.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: Arnie123

Please stop deflecting. This post is about yet another person in Trump's orbit being caught laundering Russian money. You don't have a problem with that? If Hillary had won and one of her associates illegally obtained tickets for a pair of Russian "businessmen" you would be chanting "lock her up!"

So someone is only guilty if they won?

I see...

a reply to: CB328

Triggered? What do your comrades think about that, is it generally accepted to be a vile idiot in your ranks / the left?

originally posted by: CB328

Nobody believes an Anti-Trumper like you and the OP, its really all a waste of space and time

You mean inbred, moronic Trump worshippers don't believe it, everyone else does.

I dunno.. all the pictures of how the In n Out burger boycott is NOT working suggests otherwise.

originally posted by: DJMSN
a reply to: DJW001

At least he presents FACTS, alternate or not, factual is factual. Mueller has yet to present anything other than he said and WE SAY HE SAID.

Don't forget the Mueller has already said no Americans were involved.

a reply to: DJW001

Don't you wonder who the American who wrote the fifty thousand dollar check is?

Patten used another American as a "straw purchaser,"

a reply to: watchitburn

And this is the guy who's going to represent him in am impeachment hearing.

a reply to: Arnie123

Nobody believes this guy was indicted? That's some major blinders right there.
Of course he was indicted. And yes this does hit the trump campaign.
Mueller is just showing that even the most insignificant player in this side show is going to be held up for public scrutiny. Mueller is getting ready to issue a subpoena for trump to answer questions. Trump knows exactly what Mueller is planning but he doesn't know how much he knows. About 70% more than what's been revealed so far is the number I've seen.
You can live in denial but that's not going to change things.

a reply to: MissionTruth

So....

That means ted's daddy is off the hook?

a reply to: Wardaddy454

What?

a reply to: Wardaddy454

No he didn't. Ill let you go figure that out.
Hint. Not in this indictment...

And this is certainly an American and so is the straw purchaser who is Un named in the indictment but certainly mentioned in charging documents.

Research how the FBI investigates organized crime. From the little fish to the medium-sized fish to the big fish.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123

Nobody believes this guy was indicted? That's some major blinders right there.
Of course he was indicted. And yes this does hit the trump campaign.
Mueller is just showing that even the most insignificant player in this side show is going to be held up for public scrutiny. Mueller is getting ready to issue a subpoena for trump to answer questions. Trump knows exactly what Mueller is planning but he doesn't know how much he knows. About 70% more than what's been revealed so far is the number I've seen.
You can live in denial but that's not going to change things.

As president he can also ignore said subpeona until his term is at a end.

a reply to: yuppa

Yeah ask Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon about that. One resigned rather than face impeachment and one decided to answer questions rather than fight a subpoena he knew he wouldn't win. Trump has an idiot for a lawyer so he may refuse. But in the end he will be forced to answer or forced to resign. Where the state of N.Y. and the southern district FBI will be waiting for him. He is not above the law.

a reply to: xuenchen

No it wasn't but it does show Mueller has no intention of ending this any time soon.
And that the Sept 1st deadline set by Giuliani means exactly zero.