It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RadioRobert
Going to guess piracy in that area. Although they generally hold them ransom or break them down.
Maybe she was in a big storm and taking on water faster than the pumps could keep up with, crew bails, storm slackens, pumps catch it up, ship drifts.
Nine years is a long time! Maybe they'll figure it out some day.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
Ok... that’s very strange
It’s listed as “active” but has been drifting the oceans for 9 years abandoned
Pretty sure it would have drifted up somewhere sooner
Was it being used to ship in sanctioned goods into North Korea? Or even nuclear materials?
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Kandinsky
I would hazard a guess that it was moored offshore for either:
1. beaching/stripping.
2. Awaiting drydock.
and then at some stage it has broken its moorings. My conclusion is based upon there being no containers onboard (and severed moorings up fwd). With container ships, this situation (no containers onboard) only exists when it is first launched after construction and usually during statutory drydockings (every 5 years). At all other times, it carries containers during its life - because money.
No cargo coupled with severed moorings (refer bow lines hanging) I would conclude it is opinion 1, mainly because obviously no-one was looking for it to any degree of concern.
ETA: This could also account for the lack of records regarding missing crew....because there were none at the time it was laid-up (cold-stacked mooring)
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: Kandinsky
I would hazard a guess that it was moored offshore for either:
1. beaching/stripping.
2. Awaiting drydock.
and then at some stage it has broken its moorings. My conclusion is based upon there being no containers onboard (and severed moorings up fwd). With container ships, this situation (no containers onboard) only exists when it is first launched after construction and usually during statutory drydockings (every 5 years). At all other times, it carries containers during its life - because money.
No cargo coupled with severed moorings (refer bow lines hanging) I would conclude it is opinion 1, mainly because obviously no-one was looking for it to any degree of concern.
ETA: This could also account for the lack of records regarding missing crew....because there were none at the time it was laid-up (cold-stacked mooring)
originally posted by: torok67
a reply to: AnkhMorpork
what is interesting is how many people skip everyone elses replies including the couple that explained EXACTLY what happened to this ship and continue to post nonsense.