It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
I told you i'd answer your pointless, inane, and worthless query after you answered mine. I think you'd be surprised by my answer, but I guess you'll never know until you answer first...
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
I told you i'd answer your pointless, inane, and worthless query after you answered mine. I think you'd be surprised by my answer, but I guess you'll never know until you answer first...
So your logic is to skip my question, and ask me a question lol good one!
Ok, you are not going to answer! Move on!
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
I told you i'd answer your pointless, inane, and worthless query after you answered mine. I think you'd be surprised by my answer, but I guess you'll never know until you answer first...
So your logic is to skip my question, and ask me a question lol good one!
Ok, you are not going to answer! Move on!
Its not about not answering, its about not backing down from silly posters. When you ask an unrelated and unrelevant question without any explanation you're wasting everyone's time. I hope you enjoyed a taste of your own medicine
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
I told you i'd answer your pointless, inane, and worthless query after you answered mine. I think you'd be surprised by my answer, but I guess you'll never know until you answer first...
So your logic is to skip my question, and ask me a question lol good one!
Ok, you are not going to answer! Move on!
Its not about not answering, its about not backing down from silly posters. When you ask an unrelated and unrelevant question without any explanation you're wasting everyone's time. I hope you enjoyed a taste of your own medicine
You are talking rubbish! It is relevant! You tried to sidestep the question by asking me a question lol.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
I told you i'd answer your pointless, inane, and worthless query after you answered mine. I think you'd be surprised by my answer, but I guess you'll never know until you answer first...
So your logic is to skip my question, and ask me a question lol good one!
Ok, you are not going to answer! Move on!
Its not about not answering, its about not backing down from silly posters. When you ask an unrelated and unrelevant question without any explanation you're wasting everyone's time. I hope you enjoyed a taste of your own medicine
You are talking rubbish! It is relevant! You striped to sidestep the question by asking me a question lol.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
I told you i'd answer your pointless, inane, and worthless query after you answered mine. I think you'd be surprised by my answer, but I guess you'll never know until you answer first...
So your logic is to skip my question, and ask me a question lol good one!
Ok, you are not going to answer! Move on!
Its not about not answering, its about not backing down from silly posters. When you ask an unrelated and unrelevant question without any explanation you're wasting everyone's time. I hope you enjoyed a taste of your own medicine
You are talking rubbish! It is relevant! You striped to sidestep the question by asking me a question lol.
I asked you an equally inane question to hopefully (thought I now see erroneously) to help give you some perspective.
I'm not unreasonable, explain how its relevant and I'll answer if true.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Jay-morris
originally posted by: Wayfarer
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Freely admit a certain level of ignorance but... The few videos I did see had white helmets "treating" supposed victims of a chemical attack without a scrap of protective gear, no gloves, no mask, no eye protection which would have exposed them to secondary effects.
It doesn't mean they are all or even part terrorists but it certainly raises questions about their legitimacy.
Really dude, you start good (call out your own ignorance), then proceed to run roughshod through logic with it.
Many many white helmets are poor Syrian civilians just trying to help the wounded, and the white helmet is about the extent of the standard gear they're given....
The idea that there are (non Russian bot/shill) posters here in this thread siding with Assad and his dictum to kill the white hats (slaughter them if they surrender, or slaughter them if they don't surrender) strains all credulity....
Guess you watch the "award winning" documentary about the white helmets. Western propaganda at its best!
No, havn't watched any documentaries. Try using Occam's razor once in a while on that neckbeard.....
So, I guess you believe the ilegal invasions of Iraq and Libya were justified yes?
Um, sir, this is a McDonald's drive through......
But seriously what the hell are you going on about now?
It is relivant! Was the invasion of Iraq and Libya justified? Can you answer thst simple question?
"'It is relivant" is neither an explanation nor actual English......
So you are not going to answer that simple question. Thought as much!
Surely you'd know by now we only speak ENGLISH in America. Learn it or get the F out, amirite?
Do not dodge the question. Answer my question!
I told you i'd answer your pointless, inane, and worthless query after you answered mine. I think you'd be surprised by my answer, but I guess you'll never know until you answer first...
So your logic is to skip my question, and ask me a question lol good one!
Ok, you are not going to answer! Move on!
Its not about not answering, its about not backing down from silly posters. When you ask an unrelated and unrelevant question without any explanation you're wasting everyone's time. I hope you enjoyed a taste of your own medicine
You are talking rubbish! It is relevant! You striped to sidestep the question by asking me a question lol.
I asked you an equally inane question to hopefully (thought I now see erroneously) to help give you some perspective.
I'm not unreasonable, explain how its relevant and I'll answer if true.
LOL Nice try! I think you are the only one who believes that lol
Maybe come back to this thread once you have the balls to answer it. Until you do, I will not feed your already big ego anymore.
originally posted by: Ohanka
Hopefully any country these monsters and criminals end up in sends them right back to Syria to face justice for their horrible crimes.