It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
.... I know enough to know that as we have not seen all the evidence we can't form a proper opinion.
Just going on blind prejudice mind, he's guilty as hell.
And Affray is a pretty serious charge.
You never made bannofee pie???! Key ingredient, you haven't lived!
originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: LightSpeedDriver
Ooo, that's a new one on me, I'll have to try that. Thanks.
originally posted by: FreebornInnocent in the eyes of the law but guilty in the eyes of the old school tie.
Perhaps the cricket authorities use 'balance of probabilities' like the civil court.
originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Freeborn
The CPS have to show he was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt so I suppose the disciplinary thing is a lower standard of proof. Whatever, he sure is not setting a good example.