It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: SteamyJeans
“The measure would allow children to stay in detention with parents for an extended period of time.
So now, instead of separating kids from their parents, their just gonna detain women and children in (essentially) minimum security prisons, alongside potentially very dangerous and violent men.
originally posted by: Thejoncrichton
originally posted by: Kharron
a reply to: SteamyJeans
Thank God, now the rest of the website can agree with us that this has been inhumane.
Weird, because when the 9th circuit ruled, they saw putting the kids in prison with the parents as inhumane. Mark my words, Trump will now get $hit for putting the kids in prison with the parents. The next outrage will call for them to just allow the families in to the country.
originally posted by: Thejoncrichton
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: SteamyJeans
“The measure would allow children to stay in detention with parents for an extended period of time.
So now, instead of separating kids from their parents, their just gonna detain women and children in (essentially) minimum security prisons, alongside potentially very dangerous and violent men.
Yup. Which is how we got to the separation in the first place.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: SteamyJeans
“The measure would allow children to stay in detention with parents for an extended period of time.
So now, instead of separating kids from their parents, their just gonna detain women and children in (essentially) minimum security prisons, alongside potentially very dangerous and violent men.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: SteamyJeans
“The measure would allow children to stay in detention with parents for an extended period of time.
So now, instead of separating kids from their parents, their just gonna detain women and children in (essentially) minimum security prisons, alongside potentially very dangerous and violent men.
Yes, this is what all the caring folks wanted. Now they have it.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: SteamyJeans
“The measure would allow children to stay in detention with parents for an extended period of time.
So now, instead of separating kids from their parents, their just gonna detain women and children in (essentially) minimum security prisons, alongside potentially very dangerous and violent men.
Yes, this is what all the caring folks wanted. Now they have it.
It was never about the children in the first place. I can’t wait to watch the media contort this.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: SteamyJeans
“The measure would allow children to stay in detention with parents for an extended period of time.
So now, instead of separating kids from their parents, their just gonna detain women and children in (essentially) minimum security prisons, alongside potentially very dangerous and violent men.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah
Why California and not the federal government?
The tent cities will cost $795.00 per night per person. Your idea of the holiday inn is really better but of course they can't lock them into a hotel and they don't want to risk those bad bad breast feeding la Leche league mamas loose in the South west. You never know what they will do.