It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There is nearly universal consensus in modern New Testament scholarship on a core group of authentic Pauline epistles whose authorship is rarely contested: Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Thessalonians, and Philemon. Several additional letters bearing Paul's name are disputed among scholars, namely Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, and Titus. Scholarly opinion is sharply divided on whether or not Colossians and 2 Thessalonians are genuine letters of Paul. The remaining four contested epistles – Ephesians, as well as the three known as the Pastoral epistles (1 and 2 Timothy, and Titus) – have been labeled pseudepigraphical works by most critical scholars.[4][5][6] Some scholars have proposed that Paul may have used an amanuensis, or secretary, in writing the disputed letters.[7]
A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness. But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.
so you just told me the "j" sound you are using came from greek?
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: bulwarkz
Ancient Greek.
The language the original books of the Bible were written in.
None of the stuff I say about the Bible is my own trailer park interpolation. Lol
It is the opinions of those who actually go and learn ancient languages and have access to the original copies we have..
All of Ehrman’s analysis is the mainstrean scholarly opinion as taught by every major university in the west.
That’s why he wrote his books. All of academia knows the Bible is a collection of different and contradictory accounts and scholars can tell you what I’d the oldest christology..
i cannot troll a troll
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: bulwarkz
What?!?!
I have no intrest In your trolling.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: bulwarkz
Jesus had said “there are those here who will not taste death before I come into my kingdom.”
While Jesus is teaching the people in the region of Caesarea Philippi, which is about 15 miles (25 km) from Mount Hermon, he makes a startling announcement to his apostles: “Truly I say to you that there are some of those standing here who will not taste death at all until first they see the Son of man coming in his Kingdom.”—Matthew 16:28.
The disciples must wonder what Jesus means. About a week later, he takes three of the apostles—Peter, James, and John—with him up to a lofty mountain. It may well be nighttime, for the three men are sleepy. While Jesus is praying, he is transfigured before them. The apostles see his face shine as the sun and see his garments become brilliant as light, glitteringly white.
Then, two figures, identified as “Moses and Elijah,” appear. They start talking to Jesus about his ‘departure that is to occur at Jerusalem.’ (Luke 9:30, 31) His departure evidently refers to Jesus’ death and subsequent resurrection, which he recently spoke of. (Matthew 16:21) This conversation proves that contrary to what Peter urged, Jesus’ humiliating death is not something to be avoided.
Fully awake now, the three apostles watch and listen in amazement. This is a vision, yet it appears so real that Peter begins to get personally involved in the scene, saying: “Rabbi, it is fine for us to be here. So let us erect three tents, one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.” (Mark 9:5) Does Peter want the tents set up so that the vision will be prolonged for some time?
While Peter is speaking, a bright cloud covers them and a voice from the cloud says: “This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved. Listen to him.” At hearing God’s voice, the frightened apostles fall on their faces, but Jesus urges them: “Get up. Have no fear.” (Matthew 17:5-7) When they do, the three apostles see no one except Jesus. The vision has ended. When it is day and they are descending from the mountain, Jesus commands: “Tell the vision to no one until the Son of man is raised up from the dead.”—Matthew 17:9.
Elijah’s appearance in the vision raises a question. “Why,” the apostles ask, “do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?” Jesus replies: “Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him.” (Matthew 17:10-12) Jesus is speaking about John the Baptist, who fulfilled a role similar to Elijah’s. Elijah prepared the way for Elisha, and John did so for Christ.
How strengthening this vision is to Jesus and to the apostles! It is a preview of Christ’s Kingdom glory. Thus the disciples saw “the Son of man coming in his Kingdom,” as Jesus had promised. (Matthew 16:28) While on the mountain, they were “eyewitnesses of his magnificence.” Though the Pharisees wanted a sign to prove that Jesus was to be God’s chosen King, he would not give them one. But Jesus’ close disciples were allowed to see Jesus’ transfiguration, which confirms Kingdom prophecies. Thus, Peter could later write: “We have the prophetic word made more sure.”—2 Peter 1:16-19.
originally posted by: schuyler
originally posted by: Reverbs
originally posted by: schuyler
No, the Biblical Age is not over. As long as we have ignorance, lack of education, IQs below 100, and parents who brainwash their children, the Biblical Age will continue to flourish.
we will always have IQs below 100 you dolt!
Wow, what an insult. That's heavy! Did you understand the point? We will also ALWAYS HAVE STUPID PEOPLE who believe crap. Thanks for confirming what I said.
all parents brainwash their children.. Thats actually part of this thread "there is no such thing as normal."
everything brainwashes you all the time.
Thanks for the insight. Now I know that "everything brainwashes me." Brilliant! And parents who brainwash their children in religious nonsense will ensure a continuing supply of fodder for the Biblical Age.
IQ scores are adjusted so 100 fits right in the middle of the population. Its been adjusting upwards.
So what? I have this feeling you took Psychology 101 and now consider yourself an expert. The fact is that my major points still hold, despite your inept attempt at calling me names.
1. Stupid people (below 100 IQ) are prone to believing nonsense.
2. People who are ignorant know no better.
3. Lack of education contributes to ignorance.
4. Brainwashed parents brainwash their children in religious nonsense.
Whatever category you are in, the fact that you are there ensures there will be a continuing supply of people to believe in the "Biblical Age." In other words, it is not going away any time soon. You have done absolutely nothing to refute what I said. Read your answer and you will see you reacted emotionally and added nothing to the discussion. I'm sorry for your loss.
Ancient Greek. The language the original books of the Bible were written in.
It is the opinions of those who actually go and learn ancient languages and have access to the original copies we have..
All of Ehrman’s analysis is the mainstrean scholarly opinion as taught by every major university in the west. That’s why he wrote his books. All of academia knows the Bible is a collection of different and contradictory accounts and scholars can tell you what I’d the oldest christology..