44 Dems, Including Wasserman Schultz, Exempted Pakistani IT Aides From Background Checks

The Awan story is just sickening, it shows the hubris and stupidity of the DNC as well as their treasonous leanings. Might as well change the name to the DeMarxist Party and be up front about what they really are.

Or they could go with the Democratic Socialist party but someone might put 2 and 2 together.

a reply to: shooterbrody

from someone in that world that says alot

That's my thought too. When someone in the same/similar position sees this as an immediate red flag, who knows the hazards and threats inside and out, it seems pretty darn obvious it's a problem. At the very least, it should be a priority to rule it out. But instead we hear crickets about it!

I suspect this goes deeper than we know and ties in with other ongoing investigations. Nothing concrete to go on, just my best guess.

a reply to: seeker1963

Fair points.. The comedian Lewis Black said it best -
"What's the difference between a Democrat and a Republican? A Democrat blows and a Republican sucks."

With that being said, and on this one topic, I am not aware of any Republicans who used the Awan's as IT.

a reply to: toysforadults

Some of them should have had security clearances which goes far beyond just a simple background check.

Anyhow, I wonder why they chose to hire so many IT aides from Pakistan. Seems strange to me.

a reply to: Boadicea

I don't understand why this has been almost completely ignored.
Were it a gop rep and it people with russia connections, hooly crap the world would end.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: seeker1963

Fair points.. The comedian Lewis Black said it best -
"What's the difference between a Democrat and a Republican? A Democrat blows and a Republican sucks."

With that being said, and on this one topic, I am not aware of any Republicans who used the Awan's as IT.

You are absolutely right! BUT,,,,,if they are the enemies they portray to us who vote for them? Then why the hell silence from the Republicans?????

Midterms coming up? This would be nuclear IF they weren't playing us all for suckers......

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Given DWS position, both in Congress and at the time head of the DNC, she seems to be the lynchpin. Given her close ties to Clinton and what DWS did for her during the primaries she should be the first person to be scrutinized... deeply scrutinized.

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: seeker1963

Fair points.. The comedian Lewis Black said it best -
"What's the difference between a Democrat and a Republican? A Democrat blows and a Republican sucks."

With that being said, and on this one topic, I am not aware of any Republicans who used the Awan's as IT.

You are absolutely right! BUT,,,,,if they are the enemies they portray to us who vote for them? Then why the hell silence from the Republicans?????

Midterms coming up? This would be nuclear IF they weren't playing us all for suckers......

As for Republicans the one thing I can think of is Republicans dont want to jeopardize any criminal investigations / arrest that might come from it. While the info would be damning if it came out before the midterms it would be absolutely Armageddon for Democrats to be arrested and charged prior to the midterms.

I also wonder if the Russia bs might be linked to a coverup that might include this incident. It would be stupidity for Democrats to accuse Trump of ignoring national security all the while doing it themselves. Even more so when there is no evidence for the accusations against Trump but tons of evidence for this. As Clinton said - If Trump wins we all hang.

I am more and more of the mindset that we are seeing the tip of a massive, continent sized iceberg and the Democrats seem more interested in rearranging deck chairs on their titanic.


All about public image without regards for the damage below the waterline.
All speculation of course.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: seeker1963

Fair points.. The comedian Lewis Black said it best -
"What's the difference between a Democrat and a Republican? A Democrat blows and a Republican sucks."

With that being said, and on this one topic, I am not aware of any Republicans who used the Awan's as IT.

You are absolutely right! BUT,,,,,if they are the enemies they portray to us who vote for them? Then why the hell silence from the Republicans?????

Midterms coming up? This would be nuclear IF they weren't playing us all for suckers......

As for Republicans the one thing I can think of is Republicans dont want to jeopardize any criminal investigations / arrest that might come from it. While the info would be damning if it came out before the midterms it would be absolutely Armageddon for Democrats to be arrested and charged prior to the midterms.

All speculation of course.

Kinda see where you are coming from, but they took an oath and they are getting rich as hell of the backs of hard working Americans. They are either innocent or guilty!

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: seeker1963

Fair points.. The comedian Lewis Black said it best -
"What's the difference between a Democrat and a Republican? A Democrat blows and a Republican sucks."

With that being said, and on this one topic, I am not aware of any Republicans who used the Awan's as IT.

You are absolutely right! BUT,,,,,if they are the enemies they portray to us who vote for them? Then why the hell silence from the Republicans?????

Midterms coming up? This would be nuclear IF they weren't playing us all for suckers......

As for Republicans the one thing I can think of is Republicans dont want to jeopardize any criminal investigations / arrest that might come from it. While the info would be damning if it came out before the midterms it would be absolutely Armageddon for Democrats to be arrested and charged prior to the midterms.

All speculation of course.

Kinda see where you are coming from, but they took an oath and they are getting rich as hell of the backs of hard working Americans. They are either innocent or guilty!

They did take an oath and I completely agree with that. However since Congress has no prosecutorial power all they can do is exercise oversight. Its up to the FBI / DOJ.

That alone makes me nervous.

As for net worth every single person in both houses of Congress are millionaires and it seems the longer you are in Congress the more wealth you accumulate. Nancy Pelosi is a prime example, with a net worth of over 100 million dollars. Given her salary I find that amount suspicious. Same goes for Feinstein and Maxine Waters.

im hoping for a counter argument here.....

originally posted by: Deluxe
a reply to: toysforadults

Some of them should have had security clearances which goes far beyond just a simple background check.

Anyhow, I wonder why they chose to hire so many IT aides from Pakistan. Seems strange to me.

We should ask Pakistani ISI or Iranian VEVAK.


a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Good luck... The only possible argument would be the Awans took advantage of the Democrats kind and generous nature and Democrats just missed it.

a reply to: Xcathdra


Yet they (Democrats) cheered when Jared Kushner had his Top Secret clearance downgraded to secret.

What does Pakistan do for America? We send them a lot of U.S. taxpayer dollars every year don't we?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Xcathdra


Yet they (Democrats) cheered when Jared Kushner had his Top Secret clearance downgraded to secret.

What does Pakistan do for America? We send them a lot of U.S. taxpayer dollars every year don't we?

We do send them money and equipment and in exchange we cooperate on intelligence dealing with terrorist and I believe Pakistan allows overflight / ground convoy routes for our presence in Afghanistan.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
im hoping for a counter argument here.....

I was waiting for the usuals. They must be out to lunch.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Wow. How... um... special, eh?

I think I was more disturbed by the faux emotion so many injected into their universal script. More like actors/actresses than journalists.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Boadicea

I don't understand why this has been almost completely ignored.

I don't either... unless it's part of a larger crime (or multiple crimes) being investigated, in order to protect the larger investigation.

Were it a gop rep and it people with russia connections, hooly crap the world would end.

Maybe that's somehow what the whole Trump-Russia collision nonsense is really all about... to distract from the Dem criminal activity/investigation? Or to drag the GOP into the same nightmare so Dems don't look so bad? Or maybe somehow this investigation into Trump-Russia collusion is a back door channel to investigate the Dem/Imram crap?

I really don't know what to think. I just know what we do know isn't right and doesn't make sense.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Boadicea

Well we dont really have journalists anymore. We have media conglomerates who work for politicians.

As an example for why the media doesnt report this - lets just say pay attention to the media outlets appearing in the video. Fox, CBS, NBC... It is disturbing.

A friend of mine said that he saw this video posted as proof that conservatives all follow the same script because Fox news stations are among those spouting off the scripted garbage.
I see it as proof that they all follow their script, even Fox.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
im hoping for a counter argument here.....

I was waiting for the usuals. They must be out to lunch.

If there is no counterarguement here...there likely isnt one on the talking points.

This needs a full court press

Odds are some republicans are hip deep in whatever occurred, so they are scared to push it in fear of some of their dirt being unearthed leading to arrests on both sides.