Science proves Earth is Flat

Why?

You ignore information you don't like.


Just bored like me?

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Nothin

Is Scientism not similar to religions? Are they not both belief systems?

Uh...no.

One is built on testable information, one is built on belief.

That would be your opinion.

a reply to: Raggedyman

I don't know why you persist when you are proven wrong. There are flights taking off every day that prove FE is wrong. You are welcome to board one yourself. FE has no rational scientific evidence for it. It's support comes from ignorance.

Your "you disagree so you are a faith of scientism" shtick is ridiculous, and clearly your last resort of choice when you have nothing meaningful to contribute.

Flat Earth Proven Wrong

You are welcome.

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Nothin

Is Scientism not similar to religions? Are they not both belief systems?

Uh...no.

One is built on testable information, one is built on belief.

That would be your opinion.

No, it's fact. Sydney to Santiago, testable, proves FE wrong.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yeah of course, I know what you mean obviously, just accept by faith what science you want and deny by faith the science you don't want
Don't show the empirical evidence, just talk stars and flashing lights (sounds like a religios experience happening)

Tell me, scientifically, does China generate as much fusion as a star millions of miles away, do you think that, do you have a theory on that

You should stop now ks

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: ZombieZygote
a reply to: heineken

I watched the video in its entirety the other day. Because I am open minded and already familiar with how nearly 100% of NASA photos are CGI, even by their own admission.

It is interesting how so many people refuse to believe anything the government says and shows them, EXCEPT NASA. The scientific method is an incredible process for helping to explain certain phenomenas, but the cult of SCIENTISM, with its priests like Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Albert Einstein, Bill Nye, etc, has hoodwinked humanity into blindly believing their words, and completely discounting your own senses and experiences as unreliable.

Well said ZZ.

Is Scientism not similar to religions?
Are they not both belief systems?

What's the difference between believing what NDG Tyson tells you, and what a preist tells you?

What do you know, and what do you believe?

"Scientism" is a made up word by anti-science people who are too dumb to argue scientifically against theories so instead try to lower it to the level of religion's analysis.

Did you not just make up that explanation?
That would be your opinion, no?

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
If anyone were to bother asking I can easily prove the world is round. It isn't hard. You can do it by walking outside and looking at the horizon. Your eyesight can see stars millions of light years away yet we can't see China. If the world were flat then that wouldn't be the case. And that is just basic stuff.

That is a seriously flawed argument. Not saying your overall thesis isn't correct, but if you think that proves your argument it doesn't say much about why anyone should listen to you on the basis of your scientific knowledge.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Well do that and we won't have to suffer another flat earth thread
Bring back the evidence and show those with the questions why they are wrong

Now why don't I think that will happen I wonder?

I see no questions. I see stupid videos and you ignoring my proof that FE is wrong.

originally posted by: Raggedyman
Tell me, scientifically, does China generate as much fusion as a star millions of miles away, do you think that, do you have a theory on that

You should stop now ks

Exactly---hammer meet head of nail. And that's just the major flaw. Hee-larious.

originally posted by: Raggedyman

Tell me, scientifically, does China generate as much fusion as a star millions of miles away, do you think that, do you have a theory on that

Yes I have photographic evidence. Both China's do.
Mainland China has 5 stars worth:

a reply to: Nothin

No, it's the actual definitions.

The belief that science and religion are the same things would be an opinion. Using the actual definitions of the words to explain why they're not at all the same is not an opinion.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Nothin

I can get on an airplane tomorrow and prove FE is wrong. I need no faith.

What? You could? Prove it to who?
Are you talking about an absolutely unquestionable scientific proof, that no one could deny?
Please do it then.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Persisting? Because it's fun
Santiago to Sydney, always thought it was Sydney to Capetown
Seen those flights myself, from Bremer Bay, maybe on a 40 degree longitude, my own eyes Occam
I don't believe for one second the world is flat
I just can't believe the stupidity of the people using "real" science or lack thereof to prove their point

That some people here are dictating rather than educating
That some people who have a faith in science are attacking religion as a position to justify their stupid argument
That some people who believe in scientism are juxtaposing religion instead of real science to prove a reality
That some people who claim a scientific knowledge clearly don't have a scientific knowledge that can't prove flat earthers wrong

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Nothin

Is Scientism not similar to religions? Are they not both belief systems?

Uh...no.

One is built on testable information, one is built on belief.

That would be your opinion.

No, it's fact. Sydney to Santiago, testable, proves FE wrong.

Sorry: but don't see the pertinence of your reply, to that comment.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Well do that and we won't have to suffer another flat earth thread
Bring back the evidence and show those with the questions why they are wrong

Now why don't I think that will happen I wonder?

I see no questions. I see stupid videos and you ignoring my proof that FE is wrong.

Funny,mwhat I see is people like you who have no concept of science, how it works and how to explain it acting like you have a clue
Instead of Acting like an arrogant oracle that everyone should believe and showing absolutely no reason or intelligence to justify why we should believe you
Tidy it up, act and show like you know what your talking about and maybe someone may find you credible
Catch that plane and report back

We will be waiting

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Nothin

No, it's the actual definitions.

The belief that science and religion are the same things would be an opinion. Using the actual definitions of the words to explain why they're not at all the same is not an opinion.

Agreed: that would be an opinion. But that's not what was said.
Perhaps we should revisit the original comment, to see how it was understood?

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: Nothin

Is Scientism not similar to religions? Are they not both belief systems?

Uh...no.

One is built on testable information, one is built on belief.

That would be your opinion.

No, it's fact. Sydney to Santiago, testable, proves FE wrong.

Sorry: but don't see the pertinence of your reply, to that comment.

The point is a person can catch a plane direct flight from Perth Western Australia to Joburg in South Africa and it takes about 7 or 8 odd hours.
If the earth was flat, it should take twice three times as long if not much longer for a direct flight from aus to africa

a reply to: muzzleflash

I can't 5 star that comment

a reply to: Raggedyman

Sorry, my catching that plane will do nothing as you don't care about truth. You are welcome to see numerous videos of the flight people have made. But you obviously don't care about truth or facts as I gave you a flawless argument.

a reply to: muzzleflash

I do lean very strongly to globular shape though as a result of my own personal experiences that put me in a privileged position to know.

Given this rocks constant state of motion called rotation that creates and optical illusion.

And constant volcanic activity for eons.

Globular shape is about as good as it gets.