It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: UKTruth
One minute Republicans are calling Democrats crazy and delusional for wanting gun restrictions and guns taken away, the next they are cheering on a man who says to do exactly that.
Do you see how that can easily go both ways? That's how it usually works with these political issues these days, no matter what happens there are hypocrites on both sides. That couldn't possibly be intentional could it?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
He could have been given the rifle, stolen it, bought it, or "found" it.
He bought it. Legally. It is known where he bought it, and when.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Phage
Observing that Trump is an authoritarian is nothing new.
It’s nothing correct either. Such claims are at best ill-informed, at worst outright slander.
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Phage
Observing that Trump is an authoritarian is nothing new.
It’s nothing correct either. Such claims are at best ill-informed, at worst outright slander.
In this case, libel. Perhaps. Unless it's against the government. Then it's protected by the 1st.
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
originally posted by: Phage
But I'm all for "red flag" laws. If someone is displaying behaviors which indicate a threat to themselves or others (mental illness does not qualify) the court should be able to order their guns removed.
Is overeating to the point of morbid obesity enough to get someone on the witch list? I mean, after all, that is definitely behavior which is a threat to the person themselves.
The topic is guns. Atherosclerosis is seldom a factor in murder/suicides.
Slander has a layman usage, believe it or not.
Once you're done with that you can come back and tell me how many people you personally know who are not "mentally ill".
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: VictorVonDoom
Had no business being drafted either, back in my day.
But those underdeveloped forebrains are good for something when it comes to war.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Once you're done with that you can come back and tell me how many people you personally know who are not "mentally ill".
I'm perfectly aware most people are much less stable than they portray themselves to be, that does not change my point.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Once you're done with that you can come back and tell me how many people you personally know who are not "mentally ill".
I'm perfectly aware most people are much less stable than they portray themselves to be, that does not change my point. If a large fraction of people are on antidepressants then a large fraction of people should find it harder to acquire a weapon or find a better way to deal with their depression. Just because so many people are verging on into the realm insanity doesn't make it any less of a problem, it only shows how wide spread the problem is and should make you even more worried about hordes of unstable people owning weapons.
originally posted by: mightmight
Not surprising move by Trump at all unfortunately. He already demonstrated on DACA that he is perfectly willing to pivot to the center / left.