It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fleabit
Think he might have pissed off the "right" bunch the wrong way this time...
Like I've said over the last year, his supporters were fine with Trump's apparent disregard of rights of citizens.. if it wasn't rights they cared about. But I knew for a certainty at some point, Trump would blunder to take away something his sheep actually care about (because he is fairly clueless and making it up as he goes), and then.. THEN they would suddenly realize the type of guy he was.
Don't worry - he'll do it again. He waffled on so many issues coming up to the Presidency, he is bound to anger his followers again. If he does that, there will be no chance at reelection.
Just curious, which rights of citizens did he so casually dismiss before?
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
To defend your home a Shotgun and a big arse dog should be sufficient. To hunt, Bows and X'Bows are enough to bring down every beast in the US.
originally posted by: fencesitter85
Amendments are made when things change or progress to a point which necessitates remedial action.
Having rapid-fire weapons in your home is not what the founding fathers were referring to. Nor was having an unlimited supply of guns and ammo.
"The right to bear arms" - how many? Which kind?
You could be allowed only a revolver at home and you're still having your right to bear arms met. You've all just decided to interpret it in a way which suits your narrative.