-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Certainly no intention from my part for any members to have ended up on such salacious pages. Nonetheless I apologise for your experience.

No apologies necessary.
I bookmarked it for later

a reply to: MotherMayEye

Wow - Do Dashen or MODS need to be informed as that's " reputational damage" by Google or the site that did it.

ETA - We must be getting under someone's skin. Or else the stakes are getting higher.

a reply to: IAMTAT

So naughty!

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Certainly no intention from my part for any members to have ended up on such salacious pages. Nonetheless I apologise for your experience.

pfft... I was playing with fire using that 'I'm feeling lucky' button!

im not getting any pr0n when i click the lucky button. only page 55 of this thread.

a reply to: dashen

Well we nipped that attack in the bud then?

Someone covering their tracks at the threat of reputational damage court documents evidencing something?

a reply to: RadioRobert

I loved Tomorrowland in a very unconventional way.

And I loathe George Clooney.

Tomorrowland was all about esoteric knowledge.

originally posted by: dashen
im not getting any pr0n when i click the lucky button. only page 55 of this thread.

It didn't come up this time (no pun intended).

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

The power of this threads stream of consciousness is too real.

I don't want to break any house rules by posting a link in this case but @Qanon76 put something new up an hour ago linking James Alefantis (spelling may not be 100%) and Tony Podesta in DC.

Only investigate that one if you have the stomach.

originally posted by: OveRcuRrEnteD
a reply to: IAMTAT
I'm counting 3 Qs with a possible 4th.
...still looking

The Q Qlux Qlan?

I'll see myself out...

a reply to: LightSpeedDriver

More like the Q "Clucks" Clan, as Q has us all clucking the world over!

a reply to: LightSpeedDriver

thanks for the chuckle

and this is for the best Q joke on the thread

FWIW personally I have Q team at Seven

Two are decidedly more credible than the other five.

We still havent tried to identify the new puppetmasters.
We havent considered what the seven dwarves were really created for.
Iridium.
snow white.
The mkultra senate hearings. theres countless directions to go off into. we could make mountains of new threads.
Any ideas?

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: MotherMayEye

You do know what Google is ...

I would say Google and Bing-MSN are from the same (rotten) mold.

a reply to: dashen

Any ideas?

I've got a few.

a reply to: Greenanon

Implication of Q being 7 is that the clampdown is deliberate rather than due to unavailability of 3 or 4.

According to Qs tweeting account
On 19th Feb "The ancient history of the letter Q" one could infer that Q is made up of 8!

a reply to: dashen

I suggested the idea of focus groups of 3 or 4 to do initial dives on each crumb a score or so pages back (could be more) - to avoid over duplication of work and speed up crumb digestion.

ETA - personally I'm of the opinion we are better staying in one set of threads as new red pillers will be exposed to a greater body of work from whichever crumb they come here on.

a reply to: eisegesis