It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
RISCH: "He is good guy. I hope you can let this go." Now, those are his exact words, is that correct.
COMEY: Correct.
RISCH: You wrote them here and put them in quotes.
COMEY: Correct.
RISCH: Thank you for that. He did not direct you to let it go?
COMEY: Not in his words, no.
RISCH: He did not order you to let it go?
COMEY: Again, those words are not an order.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Willtell
Its the medias job. And they will surely do their best
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: Xcathdra
Yeah I'm well aware he may have been forced to resign.
Everyone seems to think I'm defending McCabe or something. I'm just stating that he still technically resigned and is still employed and is still eligible to retire with full benefits. It says that right in the article you just linked to.
According to a Monday NBC News report, a source familiar with the situation said McCabe, 49, was “exercising his retirement eligibility” and that McCabe was “stepping aside.” McCabe will reportedly stay on government payroll until he is able to retire in with full benefits in March.
Being forced to resign may be the same as being fired to you and me, but for these big wigs there's a huge difference in that he gets to keep all his bells and whistles.
ETA: also I was responding to another poster's question about whether you get to keep your retirement benefits if you get fired. The answer to that question would likely be no, but that doesn't matter in this case because technically he didn't get fired. If that poster's concerned was that even with all this shady wrongdoing he's still gonna get his benefits, their concern is justified, because as of right now yes he's keeping all his benefits.
Here’s another possibly key detail about everything going on – it turns out McCabe decided to retire after FBI Director Wray told him he was going to demote him.
And he was going to do that because of something he saw in the IG investigation:
In a recent conversation, Christopher A. Wray, the F.B.I. director, raised concerns about a forthcoming inspector general report examining the actions of Mr. McCabe and other senior F.B.I. officials during the 2016 presidential campaign, when the bureau was investigating both Hillary Clinton’s email use and the Trump campaign’s connections to Russia. In that discussion, according to one former law enforcement official close to Mr. McCabe, Mr. Wray suggested moving Mr. McCabe into another job, which would have been a demotion.
Instead, McCabe chose to retire.
But what did Wray see in that report, and how is it related to the memo? Methinks we will soon find out.
Joel Fischer
@JFNYC1
2h2 hours ago
.@Acosta @jaketapper, can you please help me out I might be reading this wrong?
@CNN yesterday: Christopher Wray threatened to resign if Andrew McCabe is forced out of FBI.
@CNN today: Andrew McCabe forced out of FBI by Christopher Wray.
#FakeNewsCNN
56 replies 362 retweets 688 likes
Man Democrats are breaking down all over the place. It is funny yet sad, all at the same time. Democrats coming out denouncing the release of the memo when they never read it.
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Xcathdra
Man Democrats are breaking down all over the place. It is funny yet sad, all at the same time. Democrats coming out denouncing the release of the memo when they never read it.
Breaking down over what, more republican collusion and delusion, and I doubt this will be anything of substance
Man Democrats are breaking down all over the place. It is funny yet sad, all at the same time. Democrats coming out denouncing the release of the memo when they never read it.