-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

originally posted by: Greenanon
Lots of people learning what FISA stands for today.

Not here of course

Question for you if you're game. One that's been knawing at me.

Is it possible that Mueller stumbled across the FISA abuse during his investigation?

If he did, what does that say about him in your opinion?

Obfuscation?

Cooperation?

Incompetence?

a reply to: TomLawless

NOFORN

The United States also has a system of restrictive caveats that can be added to a document: these are constantly changing, but can include (in abbreviated form) a requirement that the document not be shared with a civilian contractor or not leave a specific room. These restrictions are not classifications in and of themselves; rather, they restrict the dissemination of information within those who have the appropriate clearance level and possibly the need to know the information. Remarks such as "Eyes Only" also limit the restriction. One violating these directives might be guilty of violating a lawful order or mishandling classified information.

For ease of use, caveats and abbreviations have been adopted that can be included in the summary classification marking (header/footer) to enable the restrictions to be identified at a glance. They are sometimes known as Dissemination Control Abbreviations.[50] Some of these caveats are (or were):

FOUO: For Official Use Only. Used for documents or products which contain material which is exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act.
NFIBONLY: National Foreign Intelligence Board Departments Only[50]
NOFORN: Distribution to non-US citizens is prohibited, regardless of their clearance or access permissions (NO FOReign National access allowed).
NOCONTRACTOR: Distribution to contractor personnel (non-US-government employees) is prohibited, regardless of their clearance or access permissions.
ORCON: Originator controls dissemination and/or release of the document.
PROPIN: Caution—Proprietary Information Involved[50]
REL: Distribution to citizens of the countries listed is permitted, providing they have appropriate accesses and need to know. Example: "REL TO USA, AUS, GBR, CAN, NZL" indicates that the information may be shared with appropriate personnel from Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand.
FVEY is the country code used as shorthand for the Five Eyes.
X: Information is exempt from automatic declassification (after the statutory default of 25 years) for exemption reason , and declassification review shall not be permitted for years (as determined by law or the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel). For the most part, the exemption reasoning and caveats are outlined in paragraphs (b)–(d) and (g)–(i) of Sec. 3.3 of Executive Order 13526, but paragraph (b) is typically the one being referenced as the exemption reason value .
Example: "50X1" indicates the information must remain classified for 50 years, since it pertains to intelligence activities, sources, or methods (reason (1) of Section 3.3, paragraph (b)).
RESTRICTED: Distribution to non-US citizens or those holding an interim clearance is prohibited; certain other special handling procedures apply.
Classification level and caveats are typically separated by "//" in the summary classification marking. For example, the final summary marking of a document might be:

SECRET////ORCON/NOFORN

a reply to: TomLawless

The two theories are that Mueller is either like The Wolf from Pulp Fiction doing the work of covering it all up and attempting to bury the bodies, or he's flipped and is working to dig it all up.

Either way, there isn't much room for him not to have known it was going on, and then his job is to construct a case that achieves the desired ends. The only real question are what those desired ends are.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: TomLawless

NOFORN

The United States also has a system of restrictive caveats that can be added to a document: these are constantly changing, but can include (in abbreviated form) a requirement that the document not be shared with a civilian contractor or not leave a specific room. These restrictions are not classifications in and of themselves; rather, they restrict the dissemination of information within those who have the appropriate clearance level and possibly the need to know the information. Remarks such as "Eyes Only" also limit the restriction. One violating these directives might be guilty of violating a lawful order or mishandling classified information.

For ease of use, caveats and abbreviations have been adopted that can be included in the summary classification marking (header/footer) to enable the restrictions to be identified at a glance. They are sometimes known as Dissemination Control Abbreviations.[50] Some of these caveats are (or were):

FOUO: For Official Use Only. Used for documents or products which contain material which is exempt from release under the Freedom of Information Act.
NFIBONLY: National Foreign Intelligence Board Departments Only[50]
NOFORN: Distribution to non-US citizens is prohibited, regardless of their clearance or access permissions (NO FOReign National access allowed).
NOCONTRACTOR: Distribution to contractor personnel (non-US-government employees) is prohibited, regardless of their clearance or access permissions.
ORCON: Originator controls dissemination and/or release of the document.
PROPIN: Caution—Proprietary Information Involved[50]
REL: Distribution to citizens of the countries listed is permitted, providing they have appropriate accesses and need to know. Example: "REL TO USA, AUS, GBR, CAN, NZL" indicates that the information may be shared with appropriate personnel from Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and New Zealand.
FVEY is the country code used as shorthand for the Five Eyes.
X: Information is exempt from automatic declassification (after the statutory default of 25 years) for exemption reason , and declassification review shall not be permitted for years (as determined by law or the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel). For the most part, the exemption reasoning and caveats are outlined in paragraphs (b)–(d) and (g)–(i) of Sec. 3.3 of Executive Order 13526, but paragraph (b) is typically the one being referenced as the exemption reason value .
Example: "50X1" indicates the information must remain classified for 50 years, since it pertains to intelligence activities, sources, or methods (reason (1) of Section 3.3, paragraph (b)).
RESTRICTED: Distribution to non-US citizens or those holding an interim clearance is prohibited; certain other special handling procedures apply.
Classification level and caveats are typically separated by "//" in the summary classification marking. For example, the final summary marking of a document might be:

SECRET////ORCON/NOFORN

Thanks, Mister.

I had a feeling it had something to do with foreign eyes.

I should have looked it up myself, but all the digging since October has me a bit Duck Duck Go'ed out.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: TomLawless

The two theories are that Mueller is either like The Wolf from Pulp Fiction doing the work of covering it all up and attempting to bury the bodies, or he's flipped and is working to dig it all up.

Either way, there isn't much room for him not to have known it was going on, and then his job is to construct a case that achieves the desired ends. The only real question are what those desired ends are.

Yessssss......That's my take on it, and I really can't wait for the answer.

Jumping in to say that this is a NEW thread continuing from the original.
Please FLAG it if you've FLAGGED the last one.

removed

I just want to post this picture.

Old news, but it always makes me feel good.

I want a group hug with all of these people.

Even Jared.

Especially Hope. Meow.

a reply to: TomLawless

Mueller was placed in a position of power by Rosenstein

Trump voiced his concerns about the move at the time

Mueller was put in place to shield the power players in the Uranium One deal


m.youtube.com...

Relevant as today’s lesson is self perjury

a reply to: TomLawless

That feel when a Nazi targets your waifu

originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: TomLawless

That feel when a Nazi targets your waifu

Top KEK

nypost.com...

originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: TomLawless

That feel when a Nazi targets your waifu

I'd love to know what Q has to say about the Nazi targeting HH.

originally posted by: Greenanon
And just like that a political battle became a legal battle.

Memo is missing at least one section

Not the redacted FBI version

TOPSECRET/NOFORN IS NOT A REDACTION

In my post on the memo I mentioned something was missing, it ended abruptly and was clearly incomplete. I assume this is for a tactile reason not a placating one.

The thing that is unfathomable to me is that a summery of a report is not the report, so the Dems want to do their own summery of a summery? This is like saying I'd like to do my own movie review instead of letting yours be it. So what? The movie is the movie, the report is the report, who cares what the spin on the summery is?

The reason I mention this is that it is clear the "party" such as those things go/went, appears to be entirely rudderless and this cannot simply because because of this memo nonsense. In fact, I'd argue that the entire control system, named swamp, appears to be rudderless. My hope is shortly, while attention is high, this becomes obvious so the internal narrative of those wishing to wake up will reject the entire mess as a giant cesspool not worth smelling anymore.

never mind.. carry on..

a reply to: crankyoldman

It's been hinted at in a few places that Obama sent in his own people to a lot of places and set up his own party apparatus structures that were supposed to work with the local Democrat party, but in reality, they took from them and basically shut them out.

It could very well be that the final cut off of the Democrat Party is taking place. I've seen articles about how the top donors are leaving them cut off; the party is all but bankrupt, etc.

But that doesn't mean that other structure isn't still in place. I know I've remarked on it before. It's not out on the open, you only catch glimpses of it in articles here and there where Democrat ops complain about it.

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: TomLawless

That feel when a Nazi targets your waifu

I'd love to know what Q has to say about the Nazi targeting HH.

Why do you guys channel Q when you talk? Do you think that Greenanon is Q?

I've spoken to Q from here long before Green was here.
Why do you ask?

a reply to: ketsuko

I recall this from a little while back:

WASHINGTON — Former aides to Bill and Hillary Clinton are launching a new super PAC to upgrade Democratic organizing and fundraising in support of the party's candidates around the country, NBC News has learned.

The new group, called Party Majority, would act as a parallel structure to Democratic Party committees at the national and state levels while coordinating with them. Its creation comes at a time when party committees are struggling to maintain their relevance as donors increasingly push money to political organizations that can raise and spend money with less regulation.

"Democrats are motivated to fight the Trump agenda, but without fully funded organizing operations, we won't maximize our opportunities next year and every year thereafter," said Party Majority co-founder Mike Lux, a former aide to President Bill Clinton who has helped build a series of progressive organizations over the last two decades.

"Party Majority PAC will fill in holes to make sure activists on the ground have the resources they need to be successful, working with existing organizations both new and old to ensure resources are used effectively," he added.

Despite its obvious ties to the Clinton world, the group is expected to announce soon a larger set of leaders from across the Democratic political universe.

Former Clinton Aides Launch New Super PAC

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Greenanon
a reply to: TomLawless

That feel when a Nazi targets your waifu

I'd love to know what Q has to say about the Nazi targeting HH.

Why do you guys channel Q when you talk? Do you think that Greenanon is Q?

I've spoken to Q from here long before Green was here.
Why do you ask?

I'd still like to hear how that all went down.

a reply to: IAMTAT

I ask because green is channeling Q or is Q either/or. If so, it's good to have him with us..?

What would we say to him if Q was following this thread or participating?

I’m definitely not q for what it’s worth

qs last update 1-31?

q might be dark a while