It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Observationalist
You are confusing the person with the hammer using it, with the fact that the hammer does not know, or care what its used for. Again this is anthropomorphizing science on your part. We are talking the things science studies here. Gravity just is (for example).
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Quadrivium
Unlike proving God, or any deity (why just one? (hint I am a polytheist)). There is a lot of evidence for evolution. You are still anthropomorphizing science. Science does not know or care if you believe in it. It just is. Jehovah however appears to be a thin skinned deity, and says he is jealous. My own gods are not that craven
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Quadrivium
Again, this seems to negate the thought of Natural Selection as well as Survival of the Fittest.
It would seem that if a mutation is cause driven then there should be a purpose, correct?
Mutation is not cause driven. As I said, they just happen. Mutation is a constant natural process.
Mutations happen first, and they truly do just happen, with no rhyme or reason driving what mutations happen. The vast majority of mutations go nowhere.
Natural selection and "survival of the fittest" happen second as a result of how those mutations might affect an organism's reaction to environmental factors.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
a reply to: Quadrivium
Species that haven’t changed much for millions of years haven’t had the environmental factors that would provide a catalyst for change.
For example, the oceans haven’t changed much, so any mutations of sea sponge won’t necessarily help the mutated individual sponges thrive any more than non-mutated sponges.
No advantage means all sponges, mutated and otherwise, are both having the same amount of offspring. The mutated gene is not being passed along more.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Quadrivium
Why bring them up? Why bring up creationists? we had been talking evolution, and by consequence the idea that it must have a purpose or not. Here's the thing, my faith does not postulate that the Gods created the Unierse. Rather they (univese, life etc) sprung into existence on its own.
SO again.
WHY must there be a purpose. Evolution really just is. We know how it occurs. Science does not attribute a purpose to these things. That is speculative, not objective.
QED
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Observationalist
Gravity? Its a natural phenomenon. Unlike Evolution, we don't know that much about why it happens. Though gravitational waves have been postulated for a long time, they have only been detected recently.
If you mean something else by "what is it?" please clarify
What is is?
originally posted by: Quadrivium
What I said was "Saying it just happens is equivalent to a Creationist saying God did it".
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
a reply to: Quadrivium
Mutation is always happening, but not all mutations lead to something that would benefit the organism in its environment.
If there’s no benefit, then there is no reproduction advantage. If there’s no reproductive advantage, then natural selection won’t happen.
So some species in some situations will evolve and some species in other situations won’t, even though there would be mutations in both cases.
It just happens. It just is.
originally posted by: Observationalist
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People
It just happens. It just is.
So...Science Happens
Kinda like S#it happens
Or Don’t worry be happy
Science Happens.... “it’s our worry free philosophy”
Seriously though, to say it just happens is a philosophical idea.
Science can’t do it all. If it does then your pushing into Scientism.
originally posted by: Quadrivium
Oh I totally agree that science is only a tool but how can you say "evolution just is, end of story"?
That is eerily similar to some Creationist claims that "God did it, end of story"
Have you never wondered why "it" happens? Can there really be no purpose? Without purpose why should it happen at all?
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
So when someone asks "what purpose does water erosion have for happening" I would answer:
"None. Erosion doesn't need a purpose. Erosion is a natural process that just happens. It just is."
When someone asks "what purpose does evolution have for happening" I would answer:
"None. Evolution doesn't need a purpose. Evolution is a natural process that just happens. It just is."
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
So when someone asks "what purpose does water erosion have for happening" I would answer:
"None. Erosion doesn't need a purpose. Erosion is a natural process that just happens. It just is."
Even water erosion has purpose though. The solubility laws of water balance salt-water ecosystems.
When someone asks "what purpose does evolution have for happening" I would answer:
"None. Evolution doesn't need a purpose. Evolution is a natural process that just happens. It just is."
Humans are the theorized product of evolution, so you are stripping humans of purpose. "Life is an accident", etc, etc... This is nihilism. That's where the religion of evolution leads young minds.
It's not a good path
originally posted by: Out6of9Balance
a reply to: Barcs
I knew it was called adapting.
originally posted by: Quadrivium
originally posted by: Barcs
a reply to: turbonium1
Again, there is no "evolving into" anything. Life just slowly changes in varying environments. There is no end goal. It's not that complicated to understand but you purposely choose not to so you can spew your verbal diarrhea.
Serious questions:
If there is not an end goal then what is the purpose of evolution?
If there is not a purpose to evolution then why evolve at all?
"Life slowly changes in varying environments"- why, if there is no end goal, no purpose?
Oh I totally agree that science is only a tool but how can you say "evolution just is, end of story"?
Then why do we have some species that have been the same for millions of years if mutation is a constant?
originally posted by: Observationalist
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Quadrivium
Why must there be a purpose? To imply a purpose, implies a higher intelligence in the Universe. Science is not concerned with that. Evolution just is. End of story.
I say this as a theistic scientist. Don't anthropomorphize science. Its not a sentient thing, its a tool. Like a hammer .
A hammer in a hand has purpose. Tools are chosen because of their purpose. Science alone is not sufficient. You can’t put a hammer in front of a nail and expect the nail to be driven into the wood. To me Philosophy is the hand and science is the tool.