It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think you are closer to the truth with your timelines. Research the oxygen content of earths atmosphere and you will see a trend.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: TrueBrit
Last catyclism was 9200 years ago,but you are from UK so you buy into the mainstream media,check your facts,earth was devastated 11,200 yrs ago,and then 9200 yrs ago approximately,where is your proof of this extention of yours?
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
I think you are closer to the truth with your timelines. Research the oxygen content of earths atmosphere and you will see a trend.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: TrueBrit
Last catyclism was 9200 years ago,but you are from UK so you buy into the mainstream media,check your facts,earth was devastated 11,200 yrs ago,and then 9200 yrs ago approximately,where is your proof of this extention of yours?
Your comment about a poster being from UK is partly correct. The "Royal" institution has been the clearinghouse for scientific information since 1799. And going into the "Royal" mindset, just like Royal subjects, the people owned by the crown, information is views in the same manner. Regardless as to what is said publicly. The whole scientific community seems to submit to this organization as being the end all for scientific truth.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: TrueBrit
Last catyclism was 9200 years ago,but you are from UK so you buy into the mainstream media,check your facts,earth was devastated 11,200 yrs ago,and then 9200 yrs ago approximately,where is your proof of this extention of yours?
I notice you have cleverly circumvented the core message. Oh, I agree with you. Today, there is no need to order anyone around. Its all been Institutionalized....
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
I think you are closer to the truth with your timelines. Research the oxygen content of earths atmosphere and you will see a trend.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: TrueBrit
Last catyclism was 9200 years ago,but you are from UK so you buy into the mainstream media,check your facts,earth was devastated 11,200 yrs ago,and then 9200 yrs ago approximately,where is your proof of this extention of yours?
Your comment about a poster being from UK is partly correct. The "Royal" institution has been the clearinghouse for scientific information since 1799. And going into the "Royal" mindset, just like Royal subjects, the people owned by the crown, information is views in the same manner. Regardless as to what is said publicly. The whole scientific community seems to submit to this organization as being the end all for scientific truth.
Say what again? Are you saying that The Queen is secretly ordering Britain's scientists around? Really?
(Hysterical laughter)
Um, no.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
I notice you have cleverly circumvented the core message. Oh, I agree with you. Today, there is no need to order anyone around. Its all been Institutionalized....
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
I think you are closer to the truth with your timelines. Research the oxygen content of earths atmosphere and you will see a trend.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: TrueBrit
Last catyclism was 9200 years ago,but you are from UK so you buy into the mainstream media,check your facts,earth was devastated 11,200 yrs ago,and then 9200 yrs ago approximately,where is your proof of this extention of yours?
Your comment about a poster being from UK is partly correct. The "Royal" institution has been the clearinghouse for scientific information since 1799. And going into the "Royal" mindset, just like Royal subjects, the people owned by the crown, information is views in the same manner. Regardless as to what is said publicly. The whole scientific community seems to submit to this organization as being the end all for scientific truth.
Say what again? Are you saying that The Queen is secretly ordering Britain's scientists around? Really?
(Hysterical laughter)
Um, no.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
So it’s settled then, humans built the moon 4.5 billion years ago.
originally posted by: neo96
What the hell people.
Everyone knows the moon is made of cheese.
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
I don't think humans had scaffolding that could reach that high 4.5 Billion years ago.