It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: avgguy
a reply to: introvert
Well it doubles the standard deduction, increases child tax credits and cuts about 2% from each bracket. Like I said read the bill not CNN
I have read it and you appear to be a good example of what I am talking about.
Throw the American people a small bone and they will love you for it.
Doubles the standard deduction?
Big #ing deal! The way taxes work, that does not amount to much at all.
And yet you would desire people pay more.
I said nothing of the sort.
The member I was conversing with had said this plan would benefit the lower and middle classes very highly. Which is a misrepresentation in my opinion, even with a doubling of the standard deduction.
It's small potatoes. Small bones for people to chew on while they think they got a sweet deal.
A doubling of the standard is not something to whoop and holler about or get on our knees and praise Trump/congress for.
BS. A couple thousand dollars of my own money not taken from me each year as it has been in past years is absolutely a sweet deal. Understanding I will not see what I actually want, that being a dismantling of the illogical, questionably Constitutional, and certainly conflicting of interest tax system in it's entirety, this tax plan does represent a "sweet deal" for the middle class. As for the "poor", it represents a very sweet deal to them when compared to what I would advocate. Personally, I think we need to have a much more fair system... in that I mean either nobody pays income tax or every earner pays income tax. Just because someone is "poor" shouldn't abdicate them from the responsibilities demanded of the rest of us. If most Americans are demanded to pay net positive income tax on their earnings, all Americans should be required to do so. It's called "equal treatment under the law" and it is absolutely necessary to avoid having nonsense like Kept Voters who whore their vote in exchange for political positions that redistribute more of others' money directly into their accounts.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Lets look at the tax plan from a strictly neutral point of view, shall we?
If the tax plan benefits more regular people, then they will vote in republicans in 2018.
If the tax plan harms more people then they will vote in democrats.
Honestly though, I (for the life of me) can't understand why people are against a tax cut.
It boggles the mind!
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Southern Guardian
The US has some of the highest corporate taxes in the world. It has done nothing for the poor. So how do you square that circle?
originally posted by: introvert
You take the small bones they throw at you, claiming it is a sweet deal, and will not raise a fuss, will even defend them in fact, while they still did nothing remotely close to what you would "actually want".
Tell me how that is supposed to make any damn sense.
originally posted by: MOMof3
I think if CEO’s were not afraid to speak out they would tell america they are sick of paying for wars with no return.
Then programs that help struggling americans would not be an issue.
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: burdman30ott6
I would be surprised if MOMof3 was suggesting you plunder the countries you choose to invade and f--- with.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Southern Guardian
Lets look at the tax plan from a strictly neutral point of view, shall we?
If the tax plan benefits more regular people, then they will vote in republicans in 2018.
If the tax plan harms more people then they will vote in democrats.
Honestly though, I (for the life of me) can't understand why people are against a tax cut.
It boggles the mind!