It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Here is a good one too
Jeremiah 1:5
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Here is a good one too
Jeremiah 1:5
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
Psalm 137:9
Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
It's okay to do it to those you don't like, apparently.
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: ketsuko
The SCOTUS said a woman has the right, which is held within privacy rights, to an abortion during the first trimester.
Hence, right.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Here is a good one too
Jeremiah 1:5
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
Psalm 137:9
Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
It's okay to do it to those you don't like, apparently.
I know you didn't understand what that was about, but...
7 Remember, LORD, what the Edomites did on the day Jerusalem fell. “Tear it down,” they cried, “tear it down to its foundations!” 8 Daughter Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is the one who repays you according to what you have done to us. 9 Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
Anyway, lets not get stuck on abortion rights on here
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Here is a good one too
Jeremiah 1:5
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
Psalm 137:9
Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
It's okay to do it to those you don't like, apparently.
I know you didn't understand what that was about, but...
7 Remember, LORD, what the Edomites did on the day Jerusalem fell. “Tear it down,” they cried, “tear it down to its foundations!” 8 Daughter Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is the one who repays you according to what you have done to us. 9 Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
Anyway, lets not get stuck on abortion rights on here
I know exactly what it's about. It's about vengeance and god-sanctioned baby murder. Then there's also instructions on how to provide an abortion (miscarriage) starting with Numbers 5:11.
I am not pro-abortion but I'm also not going to stay quiet when somebody tries to tell me the Christian god is 100% against fetus, baby, and child killing. It's in the bible.
originally posted by: Plotus
I must admit that once I did poop into my open hand, where I closed my fingers and clenched my fist so as to force the said poop to squeeze out between my fingers. Whereupon I raised my fist to my nose. My olfactory senses being intact, I endeavored to take a brief whiff of the concoction. I was surprised to find that there was no odor present just then, leading me to exclaim that " my poop don't stink"..... such is life for those living in a rarified atmosphere.
True story.
In view of all this, we do not agree that, by adopting one theory of life, Texas may override the rights of the pregnant woman that are at stake. We repeat, however, that the State does have an important and legitimate interest in preserving and protecting the health of the pregnant woman, whether she be a resident of the State or a nonresident who seeks medical consultation and treatment there, and that it has still another important and legitimate interest in protecting the potentiality of human life. These interests are separate and distinct. Each grows in substantiality as the woman approaches
[163]
term and, at a point during pregnancy, each becomes "compelling."
With respect to the State's important and legitimate interest in the health of the mother, the "compelling" point, in the light of present medical knowledge, is at approximately the end of the first trimester. This is so because of the now-established medical fact, referred to above at 149, that, until the end of the first trimester mortality in abortion may be less than mortality in normal childbirth. It follows that, from and after this point, a State may regulate the abortion procedure to the extent that the regulation reasonably relates to the preservation and protection of maternal health. Examples of permissible state regulation in this area are requirements as to the qualifications of the person who is to perform the abortion; as to the licensure of that person; as to the facility in which the procedure is to be performed, that is, whether it must be a hospital or may be a clinic or some other place of less-than-hospital status; as to the licensing of the facility; and the like.
This means, on the other hand, that, for the period of pregnancy prior to this "compelling" point, the attending physician, in consultation with his patient, is free to determine, without regulation by the State, that, in his medical judgment, the patient's pregnancy should be terminated. If that decision is reached, the judgment may be effectuated by an abortion free of interference by the State.
With respect to the State's important and legitimate interest in potential life, the "compelling" point is at viability. This is so because the fetus then presumably has the capability of meaningful life outside the mother's womb. State regulation protective of fetal life after viability thus has both logical and biological justifications. If the State is interested in protecting fetal life after viability, it may go so far as to proscribe abortion
[164]
during that period, except when it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother.
Measured against these standards, Art. 1196 of the Texas Penal Code, in restricting legal abortions to those "procured or attempted by medical advice for the purpose of saving the life of the mother," sweeps too broadly. The statute makes no distinction between abortions performed early in pregnancy and those performed later, and it limits to a single reason, "saving" the mother's life, the legal justification for the procedure. The statute, therefore, cannot survive the constitutional attack made upon it here.
This conclusion makes it unnecessary for us to consider the additional challenge to the Texas statute asserted on grounds of vagueness. See United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. at 67-72.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: visitedbythem
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Here is a good one too
Jeremiah 1:5
“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
Psalm 137:9
Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
It's okay to do it to those you don't like, apparently.
I know you didn't understand what that was about, but...
7 Remember, LORD, what the Edomites did on the day Jerusalem fell. “Tear it down,” they cried, “tear it down to its foundations!” 8 Daughter Babylon, doomed to destruction, happy is the one who repays you according to what you have done to us. 9 Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.
Anyway, lets not get stuck on abortion rights on here
I know exactly what it's about. It's about vengeance and god-sanctioned baby murder. Then there's also instructions on how to provide an abortion (miscarriage) starting with Numbers 5:11.
I am not pro-abortion but I'm also not going to stay quiet when somebody tries to tell me the Christian god is 100% against fetus, baby, and child killing. It's in the bible.
That's good to know, but just because you have the right to a hand basket, doesn't mean you have to climb in and take it for a ride
originally posted by: In4ormant
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: ketsuko
The SCOTUS said a woman has the right, which is held within privacy rights, to an abortion during the first trimester.
Hence, right.
Some of us don't subscribe to the idea that we get our "rights" dictated to us.
No.
In Roe v. Wade,557 the Court established a right of personal privacy protected by the due process clause that includes the right of a woman to determine whether or not to bear a child.