It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Looks to me !like the witch hunt has produced its first witch.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Not a single collusion charge. It was indeed a fishing expedition.
That resulted in catching a criminal acting against the United States. How is that a waste? "We" always said Manafort was dirty whether it tied to the campaign or not. I'm sure you'll own up to that knowledge rather than pushing your typical leftists are bad/stupid rhetoric, right?
It was sold to the American public as something else, and you bought it.
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Speedtek
They were laundering money... through real estate... in NYC... you connect the dots.
New York City is one of the largest real estate markets in the world, you need more than innuendo or commonality of markets for a charge.
Read the Indictment. It's not just innuendo or commonality of markets. Manafort is screwed. I wonder why Trump would hire a criminal? Ohhh. I guess he didn't know.......
That's right, he didn't know. The entire nature of these charges are that Manafort did some shady business and didn't report any of it to the government as he was required to. Try to keep up.
Of course he didn't know, he will soon be talking and talking and talking about how he didn't know, and Sarah Sanders will be talking about how he didn't know, as will they all. And my God! Hillary! Do Something! And of course, birds of feather never flock together.
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Not a single collusion charge. It was indeed a fishing expedition.
That resulted in catching a criminal acting against the United States. How is that a waste? "We" always said Manafort was dirty whether it tied to the campaign or not. I'm sure you'll own up to that knowledge rather than pushing your typical leftists are bad/stupid rhetoric, right?
It was sold to the American public as something else, and you bought it.
You're welcome to comb through my post history on the subject. I held both positions, still do. You know that's possible right?
originally posted by: Kali74
That resulted in catching a criminal acting against the United States. How is that a waste? "We" always said Manafort was dirty whether it tied to the campaign or not. I'm sure you'll own up to that knowledge rather than pushing your typical leftists are bad/stupid rhetoric, right?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: intrptr
I'm betting Mueller didn't do this for grins and giggles.
Looks to me !like the witch hunt has produced its first witch.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Something like what?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Not a single collusion charge. It was indeed a fishing expedition.
That resulted in catching a criminal acting against the United States. How is that a waste? "We" always said Manafort was dirty whether it tied to the campaign or not. I'm sure you'll own up to that knowledge rather than pushing your typical leftists are bad/stupid rhetoric, right?
It was sold to the American public as something else, and you bought it.
You're welcome to comb through my post history on the subject. I held both positions, still do. You know that's possible right?
I don’t care about your posts to be honest, that’s why I said “the American people”.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
No, you shouldn’t try to pass it off as something else.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Sillyolme
Looks to me !like the witch hunt has produced its first witch.
Let's not forget, that it was under Manafort's spell, during the convention, that the Trump Campaign insisted that the GOP Platform drop its anti-Russian stance on the Ukraine and retracted the part about funding Ukraine rebels.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Speedtek
They were laundering money... through real estate... in NYC... you connect the dots.
New York City is one of the largest real estate markets in the world, you need more than innuendo or commonality of markets for a charge.
Read the Indictment. It's not just innuendo or commonality of markets. Manafort is screwed. I wonder why Trump would hire a criminal? Ohhh. I guess he didn't know.......
That's right, he didn't know. The entire nature of these charges are that Manafort did some shady business and didn't report any of it to the government as he was required to. Try to keep up.
Of course he didn't know, he will soon be talking and talking and talking about how he didn't know, and Sarah Sanders will be talking about how he didn't know, as will they all. And my God! Hillary! Do Something! And of course, birds of feather never flock together.
If you want to cling to a baseless hope that Manafort would tell prospective employers about his illegal overseas dealings when he's interviewing for a job, go for it. The rest of us will be over here in reality.
The firm is so hot in Washington that even being roped into the HUD scandal has not slowed business. Paul Manafort, a partner in the firm, admitted to "influence peddling" to win HUD contracts for his clients, including a housing project in New Jersey that local officials called "a horrible waste of taxpayers' money." Since Manafort's admission of influence peddling, new clients have been beating down the firm's door.
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
Read the Indictment. It's not just innuendo or commonality of markets. Manafort is screwed. I wonder why Trump would hire a criminal? Ohhh. I guess he didn't know.......