It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Of course. Perhaps in 25 years or so, with billions to fund 2 face (Mueller) and his fools errand, they will be even CLOSER to something. No one knows what that something is yet. (get real) The real collusion is the FBI covering for Obama/Hillary/Russia. Fact. So far it's the only one. #graspingatstraws
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: links234
Mueller must really be getting close to something! I smell Trumpian desperation! LOL
originally posted by: links234
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Of course. Perhaps in 25 years or so, with billions to fund 2 face (Mueller) and his fools errand, they will be even CLOSER to something. No one knows what that something is yet. (get real) The real collusion is the FBI covering for Obama/Hillary/Russia. Fact. So far it's the only one. #graspingatstraws
From what I've seen it's likely going to come out as obstruction of justice; Firing Comey because he was leading the investigation into Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.
Even if there was absolutely zero collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, firing Comey for looking into it is obstruction of justice and could get Trump impeached for it.
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Diisenchanted
That's fine if that's the only reason he got fired. However, Trump stated, in an interview that part of the reason he fired Comey was "this Russia thing."
That's obstruction of justice. That's impeachable.
originally posted by: links234
a reply to: Diisenchanted
That's fine if that's the only reason he got fired. However, Trump stated, in an interview that part of the reason he fired Comey was "this Russia thing."
That's obstruction of justice. That's impeachable.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ignorant_ape
He won't last one term. Even Steve Bannon knows that.
Oh for crying out loud research it on a non partisan website and get some real information.
New reporting this week by the Hill has, indeed, added a layer of intrigue to the sale of a uranium mining company to Russia's atomic energy agency, which was approved by the Clinton-led State Department and eight other U.S. government agencies. But the latest developments, as they relate to Clinton, are not as explosive as certain news outlets — eager to draw attention away from reporting on President Trump and Russia — would have you believe
originally posted by: Garmanarnar
Desperate attempts here ATS 2017 style, the only conspiracy is against the president lol.
Sometimes have to remind yourself this isn't just a Republican message board.