It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by akilles
Masonic Light... How sleepy are you?
I would disagree that bankers have the most power; real power seems to lie with inherited wealth, which manipulates political power. These people seem to me have the most power and leverage.
Originally posted by freudling
Relax man, who cares what Masonic Light thinks or whatever. And of course, Masonic Light forgot to answer MKULTRA and Federal Reserve Bank of America.
I ask again, Federal Reserve Bank of America? MKULTRA!
Originally posted by zombiemann
Okay this mainly goes out to all the people who insist that masons are a branch of the illuminati and NWO. Is that REALY such a bad thing? I mean I know darned good and well that they arent but if they were wouldnt you rather be on the side with power than the side being crushed? Just my own personal opinion here and I would like to hear some other opinions without any flames or snotty attitudes. Lets discuss this. I mean even winston learned to love big brother in the end.
And please lets leave religion out of this. That has been gone over a million times.
Originally posted by freudling
Leveller, that was an ad hominen attack! Shame on you.
Originally posted by freudling
However, I fail to see how inner conflict is not imminent when you allow such diversity, if in fact one can be that diverse, specially in terms of Political views. No easy answers here, since I am sitting on the fence in terms of hating being confined to a packaged system of thought, as described above, since it limits freedom of thought and can limit evolution both good and bad.
Question (no, I won't repeat it :duh: Can a communist be a member of Freemasonary? Can a satanist? A Democrat? A Rebulican? A facist? A christian? An anarchist?
Originally posted by freudling
Citibank profitted 5 billion last year and I work for those guys.
Originally posted by freudling
I am sitting on the fence in terms of a packaged system of thought, period, no matter what organization it is. The reason is that from experience, I have found that Religions, for example, limit my freedom of thought, especially its direction.
Originally posted by akilles
"It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful."
Originally posted by Merger
Hrmmm, topic is drifting off a bit, but I'll add my two cents for what its worth.
To the question whether the NWO is a bad thing. I'll leave personal opinion out of this one (but if you look for my other posts, you may find it there), however I'll go on with what I've read other people say about the NWO.
Some people believe that the Illuminati exist, and that they are the top ruling families on the planet. People fear the NWO because some believe its controlled by satanists, and are there to destroy the current religious belief systems and introduce a new World Religion of its own that will be forced upon the individual. Mostly (and now this is my opinion) I think its a fear of losing freedom of the individual, and to be controlled by a small group where basically our thoughts are guided and mislead into a false belief system.
IMO, I personally do not believe the Masons are behind it all anyway, and if any were, it would be a small percentage of corrupt men, as there is corruption everywhere you go......
All the best
Merger
The danger here is not that you aren't necessarily using packaged thought to interpret specifics, but that it may have given you a generalised view that is hard to shake in the first place.
As already stated, there is absolutely no religious doctrine within Freemasonry
This is probably the reason why religious fundamentalists don't like Freemasonry - it gives room for personal interpretation and there is always a chance that this will expose dogma. If a man chooses to recognise dogma, the fundamentalist will realise that it will be very hard to control him.
That goes for those who follow religions as much as for those who have their own individual Faith. As all religion is open to interpretation either by the mass or by the individual, I believe that this is the correct way of looking at things. The individual should be allowed to reach his own conclusions with whatever means he sees fit.
Originally posted by freudling
No, my exact point is that I have taken great lengths to shake the programmed, generalized world view.
Then what doctrine is there in Freemasonary? If Freemasonary advocates a belief in a Supreme Being, how does that not make it, Religious? Would you say it is a Metaphysical system of knowledge, with practicality and an acceptance of modern science? That is what I have at this point about it, but it still has ingredients of Religion (i.e. Divine Illumination)
With whatever means he sees fit?