Originally posted by surfup
So by your way, we would have 50 people judging the posts, but in current way we would have more than 50 judging the posts.
Maybe if people began to cheat the system, we would move onto your way.
The numbers I used were completely made up, just the first set that came off the top of my head. More would probably be better, in fact.
I'm really expecting people to abuse the system though, especially since it would be pretty much impossible to detect. Unless there is a system to
take note of who consistently votes for whose submissions? I donno really.
And to get more diversity of judges in my system, instead of doing it the u2u way i previously suggested, how about having a rolling application form.
The form could ask for things like sex, age, and political view just to keep it simply.
Say up the umber of judges from 50 to 200. Have a quota for each age area, sex, and political view for each month similar to this:
100 men/women
50 age 16-20
50 age 21-30
50 age 31-40
50 age 41-up
50 liberals
50 moderates
50 conservatives
50 independants
That's all just speculative, and the easiest and quickest requirements I could come up with. But with the diversity that we do already have on ATS
such a diverse panel of judges could easily be accomplished.