The Colonel on Republicans

Originally posted by Colonel
Answer a questiojn with a question---old republican ploy. I was gonna leave this alone but, you all insist. I don't have time right now, tho. Gotta go.

But, since you wish this to continue, You willhave to answer my question which I have repeated NUMEROUS times before I


sound baby feet running

Ok Herr Colonel, come by when you can reply to the shuck and jive.

How would you feel if DEMs and Repubs were being USED by that same people?!

Have you taken that into thought? Just for a moment, recap in your own mind the history of these parties.

TOOL TOOL TOOL TOOL TOOL TOOL TOOOOLLLLL


Ok times up, did you think about it...ok guess not, but maybe you did.

So it's obvious your ranting about what political party is the right one goes to accomplish nothing. Not that ranting isn't useful or even benificial to most, it's just, personally I dislike current political parties. In my life time it's not the party who makes the difference but the PEOPLE UNITED for a JUST CAUSE. So please lets stop argueing about DEM this and REP that...it's old and many including myself are more willing to hear about important changes than a continued bashing.

SCREW democrats AND republicans, they go hand in hand. As it's just another way to seperate people. As is obvious in the posts above...

I agree in priciple, but until a Perot/Kennedy/Bush comes along it will always be like this.

Originally posted by Colonel
Oh, and the part of treating all republicans alike. Well, let me give you this analogy. What if I said that,"I am not racist or Anti-semitic." But I am a junior member of the Nation of Islam. Would you believe me? Would there be a slight hint of doubt?

So, too with republicans.

Yes, the NOI is extremely racist, whereas the Republican party's way of looking at life is everyone stand on his own feet and own merits. The NOI is inherently racist, whereas the Republican party is not. Very bad analogy.

Here's an interesting article that pretty much sums that topic up in a nutshell. NewSpeak is of Democratic origin, not Republican. However I feel confident that the Colonel agrees with it. Not the article, but NewSpeak.

The ambiguous decision might seem to encourage open discussion but political correctness sometimes seems determined that debate will not occur. PCspeak, like Newspeak in George Orwell's (search) classic novel 1984, forms an effective barrier.

In Orwell's dystopian world, Oceania, Newspeak (search) serves the ideological goals of Ingsoc -- English Socialism. It gradually replaces Oldspeak in defining politics and culture. Without the words necessary, complex thoughts simply cannot be expressed.

The evolution of PCspeak parallels that of Newspeak. Consider the evolution of public debate on affirmative action or, more broadly, "diversity."

First, there is the introduction of doublethink. Doublethink occurs when someone simultaneously accepts two contradictory beliefs as true. A common argument for affirmative action: It is wrong to judge people on the basis of skin color or gender; therefore, universities and employers should give preference to people based on skin color and gender.

Second, euphemistic "doublespeak" makes doublethink positions acceptable. The term "affirmative action" (search) strongly implies a positive and correct action.

Third, language is controlled to define the ensuing debate. This is accomplished by various means, including:

The link:
www.foxnews.com...

Tyriffic! I think this part of the last link summed it up nicely:

Housing is just one of the areas where the black vote goes overwhelmingly to politicians whose policies are harmful to blacks. Even more harmful in the long run are failing public schools in the ghettos, where much of the next generation has its hopes of advancement destroyed before they can even get off the ground.

No group is more in favor of vouchers than blacks -- and no one is more opposed to vouchers than the Democrats, including the Congressional Black Caucus. This doesn't mean that Democrats are racist. It is just that they need the support of the teachers' unions, and they are not going to get it if they vote for vouchers, whereas they can count on the votes of blacks regardless.

But then what do I know. I'm just a Racist, Homophobic, Caucasian, Heartless, gun toting(this part is true), Satan worshipping Republican.

Fry2,
According to Herr Colonel, I am too.......LOL

For those who may not know, the phrase 'shuck and jive' in the context related by HerrColonel, says to one (Black Man) that he sucks up and brown-noses white people to gain position-steppin-fetchit....a piece of #.

[Edited on 8-7-2003 by Tyriffic]

But then what do I know. I'm just a Racist, Homophobic, Caucasian, Heartless, gun toting(this part is true), Satan worshipping Republican.

LOL, You forgot we are also vile subhumans.

This coming from someone who is allegedly an attorney (one who twists the truth to meet his end)? Talk about being at the heart of the beast!!

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
This coming from someone who is allegedly an attorney (one who twists the truth to meet his end)? Talk about being at the heart of the beast!!

Yes T.C.
If he is an attorney.........well, God help us.

Though, he does not argue well...................

Funny, I always thought lawyers were the vile subhumans.

I know very little about politics... except that I hate the first George Bush. He said atheists weren't citizens.

Originally posted by maynardsthirdeye
I know very little about politics... except that I hate the first George Bush. He said atheists weren't citizens.

Really? Did he say that? I can't imagine him saying that. Don't get me wrong, I am not a Bush '41 fan!

If he was trying to say that athiests should not hold public office as they cannot take the oath (...so help me God...) he would have a technical point. At this point in time of our national history, that is worrying about the leaky faucet when the house is about to get ripped apart by the flash flood!

"No, I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God. "

I just thought I'm mention it.

Originally posted by Colonel
Furthermore (VALHAL), you have yet to justify your allegiance to these people who openly cater to racists if you are not somewhat like them.

I am not required to disprove you false blanket accusations and bigoted statements.

But then you know that, don't you...you're a lawyer, remember? DON'T forget your story...we'll really bust you then

Just another reason for me to assume he isn't wrapped to tightly.

This is coming from a guy who's job it was during the Vietnam conflict to insure the opiate trade was not disturbed? I doubt that was a mission the Creator viewed in good light!

Colonel,

I don't understand why you won't admit your offensive statement toward Tyriffic and apologize. You have made a fairly obnoxious, offensive statement against him with no foundation. Furthermore, I'm real unclear why you don't have a warn next to your name for it...

Couple of notes to record in the front leaf of your favorite "law" book:

1.) you making false claims against others does not make those false claims fact.
2.) you ignoring true claims against you does not make those true claims false.

There, that should help you in your next trial.

[Edited on 8-7-2003 by Valhall]

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Just another reason for me to assume he isn't wrapped to tightly.

This is coming from a guy who's job it was during the Vietnam conflict to insure the opiate trade was not disturbed? I doubt that was a mission the Creator viewed in good light!

I missed this TC????

...The Valkyrie sing....

[Edited on 8-7-2003 by Tyriffic]

Sorry. That was in reference to Maynardsthirdeye's last post about Bush '41.

[Edited on 8-7-2003 by Thomas Crowne]