It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

S. Korea plans ‘Frankenmissile’ to destroy North’s underground military bases

page: 2
12
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 06:11 PM
link   
a reply to: intrptr

The South Needs to Tunnel Under the Demilitarized Zone and Plant Bombs Under the Norths Hardened Bunkers where Lil Kim Hides and Feels Safe , then Start a Crisis with the North that will make him go there then BOOM !




posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 06:52 PM
link   
The dmz is above surface and still troublesome with landmine detection... Nazi style wonder weapon propaganda seems like a waste of time when it appears to be some sort of fire in the kitchen in the peninsula. Personally I'd land carrier pigeons, whole legions of pigeons that poop carrying one message all the way to Kims house, " your a fat little $hit"



posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 07:19 PM
link   
a reply to: BASSPLYR



G20 nations arent threatning to use them.


Neither is North Korea. However, the POTUS undiplomatic rhetoric has threatened to use them re: fire and fury.



And the person threatening to use them is certified crazy.


The POTUS is no doubt a wack job...



Soo....its sorrta different.


I agree.

It is America who has always been a threat to N. Korea and not the other way around. The US has been threatening; pointing close range missiles at; imposing sanctions; and engaging in covert war against North Korea for the past 70 yrs.

To allow propaganda to insinuate our lives and to go unchallenged is to remain devoutly ignorant...



posted on Sep, 7 2017 @ 07:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: intrptr

The South Needs to Tunnel Under the Demilitarized Zone and Plant Bombs Under the Norths Hardened Bunkers where Lil Kim Hides and Feels Safe , then Start a Crisis with the North that will make him go there then BOOM !


The border is surveilled with all kind of sensors, including seismic. Tunneling would be discovered.



posted on Sep, 7 2017 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Involutionist
a reply to: carewemust



Are we sure he can launch a massive strike when it appears like he has nothing set up to do so?

North Korea would be committing suicide if they attacked ANY country. Therefore, they won't.


This is assuming you're an expert judge of character and intent, and also assuming this guy is sane and rational, which considering all the info we have on this guy is 3rd hand and unreliable is a pretty arrogant assumption. What if, once he perfects his delivery systems, he feels invincible so decides to launch a conventional invasion of SK thinking the US wouldn't dare interfere for fear of his nuclear arsenal? Or has your expert analysis ruled this 100% physically impossible? The point is, do we want to risk letting this guy finish developing deliverable nuclear weapons and just hope he has the brains not to do anything after that? You could be right, and he's just developing them for survival value, but if you're wrong, millions of people could die. That's a pretty big risk.


originally posted by: Involutionist
a reply to: carewemust



Are we sure he can launch a massive strike when it appears like he has nothing set up to do so?

Is South Korea willing to give up its ICBM's and nuclear arsenal?


South Korea has neither of those. They have no ICBMs and even the US's nuclear weapons that were stationed there were removed decades ago to try to appease The Kims. You'll note, this strategy hasn't worked.



posted on Sep, 7 2017 @ 07:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Involutionist
a reply to: BASSPLYR



G20 nations arent threatning to use them.


Neither is North Korea.


This is false. And they didn't use metaphors either, it was a concrete threat.



posted on Sep, 7 2017 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Brotherman

NAH ...weaponize BEDBUGS with Ebola...



posted on Sep, 7 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Involutionist
a reply to: BASSPLYR



G20 nations arent threatning to use them.


Neither is North Korea.


This is false. And they didn't use metaphors either, it was a concrete threat.


Yes but dont miss out on the kicker....


North Korea promises nuclear strike on US if regime is threatened

edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 7 2017 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: spy66

I didn't miss that. In fact I was hoping he pointed that out, since Trump's "fire and fury" comment was qualified by "if they threaten us again". So is it ok to threaten to use them as long as it's in response to another nation threatening you? What's the rules here? Either way, the blanket assertion that North Korea isn't threatening to nuke anyone is plainly false.
edit on 7 9 17 by face23785 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
12
<< 1   >>

log in

join