It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pepsi78
The whole country was aware. For example, at 9:06 AM the NY Police broadcast:
" 'This was a terrorist attack. Notify the Pentagon.'"
--'Daily News' (New York) 12 September 2001 (2)
Originally posted by pepsi78
Statement :Lt. Col. Vic Warzinski
Air Force Lt. Col. Vic Warzinski, another Pentagon spokesman, [said]: 'The Pentagon was simply not aware that this aircraft was coming our way, and I doubt prior to Tuesday's event, anyone would have expected anything like that here.'"
Betwen the second crash and the pentagon crash there was "a hour"
Originally posted by pepsi78
On 11 September Andrews had two squadrons of fighter jets with the job of protecting the skies over Washington D.C. They failed to do their job. Despite over one hour's advance warning of a terrorist attack in progress, not a single Andrews fighter took off (or scrambled) to protect the city.
Originally posted by pepsi78
"The District of Columbia National Guard maintained fighter planes at Andrews Air Force Base, only about 15 miles [sic!] from the Pentagon, but those planes were not on alert and not deployed."
--'USA TODAY' September 17, 2001 (5)
Standard procedure dictates that jets be notified after six minutes of lost voice contact.
Originally posted by pepsi78
quote by you
If you want to fly for a major airline, then you need a certain level of knowledge about regulations etc.
If you don't care about landing a plane and just want to crash it, then who cares about that?
Dont you understand the flight instructors said they can not fly at all period.
Are you a instructor?
Originally posted by pepsi78
Dude, the Bin Laden family is friends with the head of every major country. They run the biggest construction company in that part of the world.
Maybe but brother of binladen is involved in to the carleal gorup
The bigest defence and weapons company producer of usa
He is still there involved so is bush and cheyne.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Got proof of that? have you talked to them? Hey Look,
This is what you call denny ignorance?
Is this it?
It was on cnn howard everyone knows it.
The fbi admited to it.
Originally posted by pepsi78
What the F are you babbling about?
just open up the patriot act there is the word nwo.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Has anyone ever produced a shred of proof that he didn't just misspeak? How about a hotel registration, a rental car reservation, anything to back this up? No?
I will give you the video with the link just hold on a second
-----------------------------
update
fema spokeman ariveing before
www.prisonplanet.com...
Originally posted by pepsi78
3 President bush giving presidetial directive order stoping fbi agents from investigateing before 911You got some specific proof of that?
I will get your proof it's all over the internet many sites have it .
It is the hole article i'll get it and show it to you
presidential directives W199i
www.jesus-is-savior.com...
Standard Operating Procedures for Air Emergencies
properly to radio contact are described by the FAA manual as follows: “… [The interceptor military craft communicates by] Rocking wings from a position slightly above and ahead of, and normally to the left of, the intercepted aircraft…” This action conveys the message: “You have been intercepted.” The commercial jet is then supposed to respond by rocking its wings to indicate compliance, upon which the interceptor performs a “slow level turn, normally to the left, on to the desired heading [direction].” The commercial plane then responds by following the escort.[6]
'American Forces Press Service' reported that ordinary people working at the Pentagon worried they could be next
'We were watching the World Trade Center on the television,' said a Navy officer. 'When the second plane deliberately dove into the tower, someone said, 'The World Trade Center is one of the most recognizable symbols of America. We're sitting in a close second.'" --'DEFENSELINK News', Sept. 13, 2001 (3)
Notify them it was attack? Sure. Pick up the bat phone and call the Joint chiefs.
Seriously, even if they notified them of the attack in NYC, that didn’t automatically mean that they knew there was also a pending attack on the pentagon.
So what if it was an hour. There was a lot of confusion, and the FAA didn’t notify the pentagon of the other missing plane (there were a lot of planes out there that had to be accounted for)
Only in conspiracy theorists little fantasy worlds, and in Tom Clancy novels do things work perfectly for the military. An hour is not a lot of time when you have spotty information, rumors and confusion to deal with.
In order to know that you have lost voice contact, you have to contact the plane first, right?
Have you any idea just how busy the airways oer the east coast of the continental U.S. are at that time in the day? Yes there was confusion, and yes, the response to the crisis could have been a little better, timewise, but when you consider that this was a wholly new situation, you realize that there were no standard responses. In any case, I don’t see any “smoking gun” here, or even a case of gross incompetence. It looks like a situation involving pretty typical human response to crisis. As you get older and wiser in the ways of your fellow man, you will understand this better.
If you want to fly for a major airline, then you need a certain level of knowledge about regulations etc.
If you don't care about landing a plane and just want to crash it, then who cares about that?
Dude, the Bin Laden family is friends with the head of every major country. They run the biggest construction company in that part of the world.
Once again I ask you THE SAME QUESTIONS!!!
Has anyone ever produced a shred of proof that he didn't just misspeak? How about a hotel registration, a rental car reservation, anything to back this up? No?
3 President bush giving presidetial directive order stoping fbi agents from investigateing before 911You got some specific proof of that?
What, they admitted that there are people with the same names? What, you mean that there are TWO Muslims named Mohammad?
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
jsd, you have egregiously misquoted me.
You quote me as saying:
The sad thing is that this will only convince the real nut-bars that Popular Mechanics is part of the plot, too.
That is correct; I said that, and I stand by it.
However, you continue to quote me as saying:
Is it not a little odd that the so called "researcher" who wrote the article for PM lied to an interviewer about being related to the head of Homeland Security? This "researcher", being in his early twenties, was undone when his mother in fact told the interviewer they are cousins.
If you want credible info visit: www.physics911.com
The "debunking" attempt was a joke. An amature [sic] attempt at best. Just one example; his argument that the hole in the Pentagon is what one would expect from the dimensions of the 757 is inane. Are we to believe the wings and engines under them somehow 'followed' the fuselage through that hole of 16'x20' ? The engines are 50' apart from each other for one thing..............
One shouldn't be so quick to discount glaring discrepancies [sic].
I did not say that; indeed, that is the exact opposite of my view.
You quote me as saying that the view that the wings followed the fuselage into the hole is “inane”. I, for one, happen to believe that there is an excellent chance that such a phenomenon could occur
Furthermore, you have me making errors in both spelling and grammar. As someone who believes in both detailed research and careful presentation of my views, including using a spell-checker, attributing such execrable grammar and spelling to me is unconscionable.
I am assuming that you did not do this on purpose; probably, you merely forgot to use the slash-quote code at the end of the first sentence, which is the only statement I made here.
I would appreciate your editing your post to ensure that I am not quoted as saying something which I personally think is incorrect.
" OTS the over drama in your posts is getting kind of old, but to each his own."
Originally posted by Vis Mega
...
Remember, its not about what DID happen on 9-11, its also about what DID NOT happen on 9-11.. like for example.. why did the terrorists hijack the planes so early in the morning, and keep the death toll so low, also hitting the building really high up, instead of down at street level where the devistation and death would have been much much much higher and prevented many more people from escaping the building. Hell, if the even had a clue that the building MIGHT collapse from the attack, then they would want to hit it lower in the buildings support to make it even more unstable.. it just makes sense from a murderous lowlifes perspective.
...
Originally posted by pepsi78
If you want to fly for a major airline, then you need a certain level of knowledge about regulations etc.
If you don't care about landing a plane and just want to crash it, then who cares about that?
So the flight instructors are just idiots right , people with great expiriance
that train so many people are just a bunch of idiotic figures ?and does not
know nothing about the fact.
Is that what you are sayng?
Originally posted by ANOK
The fool is one who refuses to even imagine that anything done by the government and it's agencies is not as they say. And the bigger fool is one who spends his own time trying to convince other people to ignore any evidence that contradicts the party line. If I was a dictator I would be trying to hire you!
Originally posted by AgentSmith
It's foolish to think that everything is a conspiracy theory though.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Flyng a small plane is a thing and flying a large comercial boeing is another thing.
It does not matter any way the statements remain the same has they where made by the flight instructors"they could not fly at all"
and "we cant belive on this day that they where able to fly"
[edit on 19-11-2005 by pepsi78]
After about a week of training, I was familiar with the layout of the flight deck and with the operation of the flight controls, autopilot, and navigation systems. As a result, flying the simulator was much less difficult than I had imagined at the beginning of the course. The most difficult part of the simulator training was takeoffs and landings. On the other hand, flying the aircraft in other phases of flight was relatively easy, even compared to flying a Cessna 172. Changing the aircraft's course, speed, or altitude was not very difficult when using either the autopilot system or when flying the aircraft manually. The flight control system made the aircraft rather responsive and made it easy to perform normal flying manuvers.
Given my experiences in the simulator, I feel that if I were to be put into a 757's cockpit in the middle of a flight on a relatively clear and sunny day, I would be able to change direction and altitude without any trouble. Given a basic knowledge of a region's geography and of available navigational aids, I would also be able to navigate well enough that I could find a major city and fly the aircraft to any major landmark in that city. Because the basic cockpit layout and many of the procedures used in the 757 are almost identical to those of the 767, I feel that the same would be true for a 767.
In short, I believe that any person who has earned a private pilot's license and who has access to the same kind of ground school and simulator training that I received could fly a 757 or 767 well enough to hit a large building. Given the wide availability of this kind of training, it would appear that the kind of terrorist actions that took place in New York and Washington could easily be repeated in the future.
www.airsafe.com...
Originally posted by AgentSmith
One thing that makes it hard, that is a bit hypocritical of some people, is that they will pick and choose the facts they want and ignore others.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Have you any idea just how busy the airways oer the east coast of the continental U.S. are at that time in the day? Yes there was confusion, and yes, the response to the crisis could have been a little better, timewise, but when you consider that this was a wholly new situation, you realize that there were no standard responses. In any case, I don’t see any “smoking gun” here, or even a case of gross incompetence. It looks like a situation involving pretty typical human response to crisis. As you get older and wiser in the ways of your fellow man, you will understand this better.