It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Military accident investigators believe the Special Forces plane was hit when at least six heatseeking SA-18 missiles were fired at it.
The multiple firing of the one metre long missiles that travel twice the speed of sound would have confused the plane's defences.
Britain's Ministry of Defence last night was unwilling to talk about what caused the deaths of nine RAF men and a specialist army signaller when the Hercules was shot down on Sunday last week near the town of Taki, 30km northwest of Baghdad.
But first indications from investigators suggest that a new variant of the Russian-made SA-18, a shoulder-launched missile with a range of 6km, was used.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
What makes that launcher/missle any different than the standard? It looks like the same old grouse to me. Sa-18 is an upgrade from sa-7 and sa-14, is that what you/they mean?
The new seeker offers better protection against electro-optical jammers; the probability of kill against an unprotected fighter is estimated at 30-48%, and the use of IRCM jammers only degrades this to 24-30%.
The multiple firing of the one metre long missiles that travel twice the speed of sound would have confused the plane's defences.
The new seeker offers better protection against electro-optical jammers; the probability of kill against an unprotected fighter is estimated at 30-48%, and the use of IRCM jammers only degrades this to 24-30%.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Is this evidence that Iran is supporting the insurgency in Iraq to try to destabilize the fledgling democracy forming there? I think it's likely and more reason that Iran needs to be dealt with swiftly.
Originally posted by Megahurts
Isn't six SAMs a touch of overkill? From a tactical point of view how much sense would it make to the insurgents to keep that many missiles together in one place, or even distrubted over a radius of 6km?
Originally posted by Megahurts
From the FAS description this is a passive IR missile, IE there would be little or no indication in the cockpit that a launch was about to or had occured.
AFAIK the RAF C130s rely on chaff/flare Anti-missile systems, so assuming that changes the kill probability to around 50-60% to allow for the different type of aircraft that would seem to suggest that around 10-12 SAMS were actually fired for 6 to hit the target.
Does anybody know the altitude that the C130 supposed to be flying at?
Originally posted by Souljah
who really knows how these missiles got in the hands of iraqi guerrilas.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Is this evidence that Iran is supporting the insurgency in Iraq to try to destabilize the fledgling democracy forming there? I think it's likely and more reason that Iran needs to be dealt with swiftly.
Originally posted by bodrul
open weapons dumps could be the answer
tons of unacounted weapons that were dumped by the former Iraqi forces and so on
Originally posted by spacemunkey
There is no other news on any other sites.
How reputable is the Australian Herald?
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Is this evidence that Iran is supporting the insurgency in Iraq to try to destabilize the fledgling democracy forming there? I think it's likely and more reason that Iran needs to be dealt with swiftly.
New York Times: Iraqi Rebels Refine Bomb Skills, Pushing Toll of G.I.'s Higher (page two)
June 22, 2005
A Pentagon official involved in combating the devices said shaped charges seen so far appeared crude but required considerable expertise, suggesting insurgents were able to draw on well-trained bomb-makers, possibly even rocket scientists from the former government. Shaped charges and rocket engines are similar, the official said.