It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“The threat is much more immediate now and so it’s clear that we can’t repeat the same approach – failed approach of the past,” H.R. McMaster, the adviser, said during a security conference with Homeland Security Chief John Kelly.
He said it would be insanity to continue to do the same thing the U.S. has done for years and expect a different result.
originally posted by: Junkheap
originally posted by: iWontGiveUP
The only way to do it Rite is...
Sorry hard for me to say..
But we need to go nuclear first!
Any other option will result in massive casualties
The lesser of two evils
And we're gonna need a lot more CBRN trained Soldiers
Nuclear weapons are just children's toys.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan
Meh, the ISIS is nearly done, the US military needs another war zone to play in.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: makemap
We rode up Russia's ass three times. Afghanistan in 2001, Georgia in 2009, and Ukraine 2014. Then again, they did start retaliating starting in Georgia, which is where I measure the start of WW3 in 2009.
Maybe China will give us one where they just sit there and watch like the Russians did in '01 ??
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
This is much ado about nothing ala the MSM. First of all, the military routinely develops 'military options' for any potential adversary. It doesn't mean it's a first strike plan, but rather more than likely (continued) contingency planning in the event fat boy does something stoopid.
originally posted by: MrBlaq
Wow, here we go with this tripe & BS again.
North Korea isn't hurting anything but
some peoples manipulated to believe
falsehoods of delusion and fear.