It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
President serves at the pleasure of the US citizens
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Trump could legally and easily pardon every individual in his campaign if he so chose, by the stroke of a pen. That would end the investigation.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Trump could legally and easily pardon every individual in his campaign if he so chose, by the stroke of a pen. That would end the investigation.
Yep. And start a new investigation into an abuse of power.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Issuing pardons is not abuse of power.
Article IV: States that using the powers and influence of the office of President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has engaged in conduct that resulted in misuse and abuse of his high office, impaired the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, and contravened the authority of the legislative branch and the truth seeking purpose of a coordinate investigative proceeding, in that, as President, William Jefferson Clinton refused and failed to respond to certain written requests for admission and willfully made perjurious, false, and misleading sworn statements in response to certain written requests for admission propounded to him as part of the impeachment inquiry authorized by the House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States. States that William Jefferson Clinton, in refusing and failing to respond and in making perjurious, false and misleading statements, assumed to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the sole power of impeachment vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives and exhibited contempt for the inquiry.
States, with reference to each article of impeachment, that: (1) in so doing, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States; and (2) William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
He would have to answer to the voters in 2020, though, and that could be an issue.
ETA: actually, there is no law against "abuse of power." That's a catch-all vernacular phrase to indicate corruption... which Comey just proved exists primarily in those other than Trump.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: alphabetaone
That is not related to pardons.
Can you show me a case where a pardon has led to a successful charge of abuse of power against the President of the US.
Was Bush charged after he pardoned Casper Weinberger?
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: alphabetaone
That is not related to pardons.
Can you show me a case where a pardon has led to a successful charge of abuse of power against the President of the US.
Was Bush charged after he pardoned Casper Weinberger?
That's not the point. Your argument is based upon a theoretical that never happened in the first place, and the theory is based upon a blanket series of pardons, not a singular pardon, that would have drawn serious blowback and suspicion.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: UKTruth
*I* am not forwarding the pardon argument, you guys are by suggesting the investigation could have easily been concluded by pardoning everyone involved. Which would be true. But in tandem with the firing of former director Comey who is now on record and under oath (so clearly the "FAKE NEWS" spin has flown out the window, as well all the other "sources say" arguments) making well documented claims with only a flimsy rebuttal by a corporate shyster who has a record of screwing up litigation, and a wave of pardons would certainly draw an abuse of power investigation.
..it is IF (like in the case of the Clinton impeachment proceedings)
True, but not just though...don't forget midterms are going to be more near-term important. The LAST thing President Trump wants right now is to lose control of the House or Senate.
Well as ive shown above, there is a law against it depending on your view of "law" in this instance. Obviously a sitting President cannot be charged, but it is cause for action or removal.
Also, youre mistaken that the take away is only limited to those other than President Trump. It was a public hearing and the vast public awareness is such that he was and is continuing to be corrupt.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Why would Mueller look into a charge of obstruction of justice regarding something that Trump is legally allowed to do?
You are not making sense.
Seriously, you are just flogging a dead horse.
The nonsense about obstruction of justice is...
The only avenue left open is impeachment
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: UKTruth
Why would Mueller look into a charge of obstruction of justice regarding something that Trump is legally allowed to do?
I would imagine by now, this tone has changed.
You are not making sense.
Seems I was.
Seriously, you are just flogging a dead horse.
Seems I wasn't.
The nonsense about obstruction of justice is...
...precisely what Bob Mueller is investigating and even by President Trump's own admission.
The only avenue left open is impeachment
Seems it isn't.
originally posted by: UKTruth
No - perhaps you'd like to advise why you think the SC is investigating Trump? Better still , when you can confirm such, get back to me.