It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth
You mean like CNN's headline that said Comey was going to deny he told Trump he was not under investigation?
Don't worry - all the propaganda in the media is all retrievable.
By all means, please retrieve that exact headline.
CNN corrects Comey-testimony-prediction story
On CNN’s air, analyst Gloria Borger put matters more starkly, saying, “Comey is going to dispute the president on this point if he’s asked about it by senators, and we have to assume that he will be. He will say he never assured Donald Trump that he was not under investigation, that that would have been improper for him to do so.”
Wednesday afternoon produced a document that underscored the perils of such testimony-prediction.
@UKTruth : You beat me on that one ...
It amazes me how people can brazenly try to lie about CNN being wrong, when the evidence is so easily retrieved. I think these people do actually live in an alternate reality.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth
Wrong - the President and the WH were specifically referenced.
Sorry... could you find that in the transcript for me, please?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth
So you found one analysis that speculated about what Comey would say, which they later corrected, and that somehow falsifies everything else that they reported correctly?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth
It amazes me how people can brazenly try to lie about CNN being wrong, when the evidence is so easily retrieved. I think these people do actually live in an alternate reality.
And it amazes me how people can brazenly lie about CNN being right. No-one is perfect. CNN makes it clear when it is speculating. Their sources were 100% accurate, their analysis was faulty, but they issued a correction. We'll never see Trump do that.
Rogers, Coates, Rosenstein and McCabe all said, under oath, they have never felt that they have been pressured by the President or anyone in the WH to do anything illegal or even suspect. They were very clear and that is all that is important.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: kosmicjack
I didn't understand today's testimony by Rodgers and Coats at all. And Comey's statement was kind of a non-starter. I have no idea where this circus is headed.
Well, I understand why they were saying what they said. They simply didn't want to be the ones appearing to cast any more doubt on an investigation that Mueller had to take over. That's their rationale anyway.
However, they chose the wrong information to apply that rationale to. The questions they were being asked, under normal circumstances, were innocuous...which boils down to "Did the President ask you a question?", and they chose that particular shield for their answers....that is the confusing part to me.
originally posted by: Grambler
Does anyone know what time the testimony starts, and if there will be somewhere online to watch?
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: UKTruth
Rogers, Coates, Rosenstein and McCabe all said, under oath, they have never felt that they have been pressured by the President or anyone in the WH to do anything illegal or even suspect. They were very clear and that is all that is important.
That does not mean they weren't asked. All four refused to answer that question. There's no excuse for them to have not answered that question. They could divulge enough of conversations with the President to say they weren't pressured but not enough to say they weren't asked? That's clownish.
originally posted by: marg6043
all this witch hunt on assumptions and media word playing, is going to come back and bite them in their nasty dirty butts.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: alphabetaone
Like I said yesterday, Comey is not going to give the democrats what they want, game over.