It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
For those that like to read articles with links and stats....
www.usnews.com...
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: carewemust
That is pretty crazy but doesn't that mean black people are more prone to being murdered than white people by a very large margin?
And before you bring up black on black crime, white people are killed by other white people 80%+ of the time which isn't that far off from the 90% black on black crime.
Why aren't white people outraged over white on white crime and why are they ignoring it?! What a tragedy!
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: carewemust
That is pretty crazy but doesn't that mean black people are more prone to being murdered than white people by a very large margin?
And before you bring up black on black crime, white people are killed by other white people 80%+ of the time which isn't that far off from the 90% black on black crime.
Why aren't white people outraged over white on white crime and why are they ignoring it?! What a tragedy!
originally posted by: TheRedneck
I know what's wrong in Chicago, and it hasn't been mentioned yet.
The crime wave has nothing to do with skin color. Anyone can find statistics that show a correlation, but correlation does not imply causation.
It ain't the guns. Chicago, as has been stated multiple times, is the heart of gun control in America. It is the test bench for gun control. If the crime rate were extremely low in Chicago, it could be argued that gun control works. But the crime rate is extremely high where gun control is rampant, so it's a failed experiment.
It's not poverty. Poor people are people with little to no money, not people who commit crimes. There are plenty of poor areas with much less crime across the country. As before, one might find a correlation, but that is not indicative of causation.
The problem is respect... or rather, a lack of it. As a truck driver, I have driven all around and all through Chicago. I've had 18 wheels on Lakeshore Drive (yeah, illegal, I know... wrong turn and panic while I found my way out). I've seen the Loop close up as I passed by to get to a receiving facility. One of my companies had a terminal in the middle of Chicago... the directions included "turn left just before you hit the low-clearance overpass."
Chicagoans have zero respect for others. I have seen it time and time again. They'll cut you off, swerve to run you off the road, ignore signs and warnings, and generally drive as though everyone else on the road is a direct assault on them personally. I would... actually I have... traded a load that went around Chicago for one that picked up in Queens, New York and delivered in downtown Atlanta.
Normal people don't shoot each other. Normal people don't try to run you off the road because they're in a hurry. Normal people have enough respect for each other to work out differences and try to coexist. Chicagoans don't have that respect... it's every man for himself, damn anyone else. I'm sure there are exceptions... but exceptions by definition are not the rule.
Poverty correlates to crime not because poor folk are criminals, but because poor Chicagoans don't care about anyone but themselves and feel justified in committing crimes against those other people who don't matter to them. They need what someone else has, so the obvious solution is to take it. The other person doesn't matter. Democrat might correlate, because look at the way Democratic leaders disrespect others: Hillary joking about how the FBI can't touch her while calling half the country "deplorable." Obama blatantly lying about "if you like your plan, you can keep your plan." Warren openly refusing to follow Senate rules on decorum. Al Green demanding Impeachment proceedings without charges because he doesn't agree with the election results... all prime examples of disrespect. If the leaders can get away with it, why can't the people? Skin color might correlate because statistically a larger percentage of black than whites are living in inner-city poverty.
But they only correlate because they have a common cause, not because they are causative in themselves. That common link is disrespect for others. And it's spreading.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
For those that like to read articles with links and stats....
www.usnews.com...
There's one chart in that US News.com link that's stunning.
Roughly 1,200 more Blacks were murdered in 2015 than Whites. Yet Blacks make up only 13% of the entire U.S. population.
Cursed race?
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Edumakated
I understand percentages and "per capita", your point is not lost on me.
I also understand raw numbers as well and the raw numbers say that white people commit more rapes and mass murders than any other race regardless of what percentage of the population we make up. You can bring up per capita and percentages all you want, that doesn't change the fact that white people commit crime just like black people do.
Which is more dangerous, 10 lions or 100 lions? 10 rapes or 100 rapes? 10 mass murderers or 100 mass murderers? 10 black men killing or 100 white men killing?
Focusing on one race above all others is ignorant. If you really wanted to stop crime you wouldn't pick and choose which race needs to be stopped, you'd want to stop crime regardless of skin color.
Your issue clearly isn't with crime, it's with what skin color is committing it.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Again, what does race have to do with stopping crime when all races commit crime? If you single out any one race you are ignoring the other ones who are doing the same thing.
Do white people kill other people? Do black people? Asian people? Indian people? Etc.? If so then crime is a universal problem, not just a problem among one ethnicity.