Ivanka, Chelsea, or Meghan. Who will be the first FemPOTUS?

Of course, the premise of this thread is disturbing. We're discussing femaleness like it's a qualification for the job which it isn't anymore than hair or eye color is.

Probably Jenner.

It's what the deep globalist progstate state needs, and wants. I mean...really.

Is it that hard to say she ?

I only wish I were being facetious.

Don't let me down,

Bruce.

m.youtube.com...

# 790

If politics has now fallen under the guise of entertainment....

Bring her Back....

No damn legacy presidents please

originally posted by: JinMI
I'd like to vote now please.

I'd like to glaze her doughnuts.

a reply to: Kali74

Completely understandable. I wouldn't trust her enough to let her close to my family, but with politicians, I usually just look for whoever will implement my interests. Or at least whoever won't attack my interests.

I've heard talk of Oprah running in 2020. I'm not sure how serious she is about but she might have a shot to win.

a reply to: SaturnFX

Nooooooooooooooooooo !
Anybody but Chelsea "Horseface" Clinton....unless of course she's running for the Kentucky Derby.....

a reply to: ketsuko

Of course, the premise of this thread is disturbing. We're discussing femaleness like it's a qualification for the job which it isn't anymore than hair or eye color is.

That the premise gets the amount of traction it does is disturbing.

If there ever is one, it will be Tulsi Gabbard

a reply to: SaturnFX


If President Trump does a great job for 4 years, gets fed up with Government, and campaigns for Ivanka, she's a shoe-in.

All other options are too Mandella-like.

None of the above.

They may, indeed, someday be PoTUS, but not the first female.

Needless to say, there are far better choices out there on any side of the political spectrum. The trick will be getting 'em to run.

a reply to: seagull


Wouldn't that be amazing, the two best qualified candidates in a run off?

a reply to: SaturnFX

How about we quit promoting these ideas of royal dynasties already?

Or maybe go move to England. Or Saudi Arabia.

We've had enough Bush's, Clinton's, etc.

What lack of vision, imagination, et l is it with everybody to dare to push forward with a future not dominated by the same bastards the MSM has raised US all on our entire lives?

What's with our lack of evolution away from sheepish regressivism?

And BTW: drop dead gorgeous such types would be a total disaster in terms of men being hopelessly mind controlled by such creatures. We're just not evolved enough yet for it to not turn into some dystopian social malady flick scenarios.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

And BTW: drop dead gorgeous such types would be a total disaster in terms of men being hopelessly mind controlled by such creatures. We're just not evolved enough yet for it to not turn into some dystopian social malady flick scenarios.

And yet there is part of me that would gladly call Ivannka Guinevere. NVM, you're right.

originally posted by: Kali74
At the risk of starting a Pocahontas circle jerk...What about Elizabeth Warren? There's Tulsi Gabbard too.

I love women in uniforms.

Dang it's hard to decide.

originally posted by: ketsuko
Of course, the premise of this thread is disturbing. We're discussing femaleness like it's a qualification for the job which it isn't anymore than hair or eye color is.

Now you understand why threads about Trump's maleness are disturbing.

Welcome madam President

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
Welcome madam President

Melania Trump without makeup?

a reply to: Deaf Alien

hahahah....almost. Good one.