It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ivanka, Chelsea, or Meghan. Who will be the first FemPOTUS?

page: 3
5
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 28 2017 @ 12:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
a reply to: Deaf Alien

hahahah....almost. Good one.





*winks*





edit on 5/28/2017 by Deaf Alien because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 28 2017 @ 12:49 AM
link   
Wouldnt it be grand...for the first USA female president to have a schlong ?

That would be epic !!!



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 12:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

indeed...likeness is uncanny



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 02:29 AM
link   
Well if you want to hit the trifecta:

1. Female
2. Black
3. Republican

Bonus feature: Openly transgender.




posted on May, 28 2017 @ 02:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: EternalShadow
Well if you want to hit the trifecta:

1. Female
2. Black
3. Republican

Bonus feature: Openly transgender.


Xuenchen wins the trificta.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: ketsuko
Of course, the premise of this thread is disturbing. We're discussing femaleness like it's a qualification for the job which it isn't anymore than hair or eye color is.

Now you understand why threads about Trump's maleness are disturbing.








No, that's a different thing.

This is simply a thread about deciding on a person to be president because she has a vagina + famous name.

Those other threads are about Trump not caring about acting like a traditional man as opposed to a new world beta male concerned about projecting too much toxic masculinity.

Honestly, as a woman, I prefer the masculine male to the beta type. I want a man, not a neuter who seems ashamed of who and what he is.
edit on 28-5-2017 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:34 AM
link   
a reply to: SaturnFX

Ivanka Trump will be stained by her fathers legacy so not her.
Chelsea Clinton bears the Clinton name so not her.
Meghan Mccain works for Fox so probably her.

Other candidates may be available and may contain nuts.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 08:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: imwilliam
a reply to: seagull


Wouldn't that be amazing, the two best qualified candidates in a run off?



We need to boycott party's for that.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 08:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: SaturnFX

Ivanka Trump will be stained by her fathers legacy so not her.
Chelsea Clinton bears the Clinton name so not her.
Meghan Mccain works for Fox so probably her.

Other candidates may be available and may contain nuts.


How about both Meghan and Chelsea spew out word salad and mistake them for deep thoughts, so not them?

I don't know what Ivanka has going on upstairs, but odds are that she's not anymore of a true deep thinker either. Although she may have slightly more business savvy.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 08:40 AM
link   
How about none of them? They're all from the establishment now.

vote for some chick working her butt off to get somewhere.
I think that would be a much better future.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 09:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
Wouldnt it be grand...for the first USA female president to have a schlong ?

That would be epic !!!


Not anymore, supposedly Jenner underwent the chopadicophemy procedure.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 10:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
Welcome madam President





To be the first female president you would have to actually be female presumably.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 10:36 AM
link   
I'm going to go with one of the Kardashians.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: SaturnFX

I'm against both Ivanka and Chelsea. I don't like political dynasties and both of them should be ruled out by their parents. Meghan is just a pundit, I've caught her radio show once or twice and never been all that impressed by her.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 11:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
How about both Meghan and Chelsea spew out word salad and mistake them for deep thoughts, so not them?

I don't know what Ivanka has going on upstairs, but odds are that she's not anymore of a true deep thinker either. Although she may have slightly more business savvy.


Ivanka is pretty smart, she understands politics well if her book is any indication (it could have all been the ghost writers thoughts though). But, that doesn't change the fact that we shouldn't have political dynasties.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 12:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Teikiatsu

originally posted by: MarioOnTheFly
Wouldnt it be grand...for the first USA female president to have a schlong ?

That would be epic !!!


Not anymore, supposedly Jenner underwent the chopadicophemy procedure.


Chopa whatta ??




posted on May, 28 2017 @ 01:45 PM
link   
As Chairman on the ZNC my choice is obvious.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 01:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

As Chairman on the ZNC my choice is obvious.


Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

Zombie National Committee?



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: SaturnFX

I'd go with Elizabeth Warren... but would prefer Ruth Bader Ginsberg. However,I know she's not running.

The women you list are too young and don't have enough of a political machine behind them and Ivanka may become very problematic soon. This Amy Davidson article mentions 13 who do have the power, backing, money, and clout. Warren is in there along with Duckworth and several others.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

Zombie National Committee?


Nope.







 
5
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join