It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The public don't need to know every detail and in some cases it could be very detrimental to release such details. We don't have the God given right to know all the ins and outs of the Intelligence Service's operations.
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
a reply to: JinMI
I thought we weren't allowed to call anything a false flag anymore?
Rescue workers sifting through the carnage outside the arena on Monday night discovered Mr. Abedi’s identification card. That clue led the police to the home he shared with his family on Elsmore Road, in the Fallowfield district. The police blew the house’s door off its frame, to safeguard against booby traps, as shocked neighbors watched.
Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour has reached its highest poll rating in the General Election campaign so far after the party launched its radical manifesto.
While the Conservatives still enjoy a commanding lead Labour were up two points on 32 per cent, with the Tories down one on 45, a YouGov poll for The Times found
originally posted by: JinMIFair point. To that I ask: Why did we see the remnants of the implements used?
Why are they telling us who he is and where he comes from and who his family is?
What is the point of having victims families on morning news shows reading words that aren't their own instead of their own account?
What would help with safety and some measure of security is:
How he got through.
Where he got his resources.
Why he was able to cause that much injury and death.
I don't think this is false flag. There's plausibility. Youa re asking all these "why" questions when no one knows the answers yet. Absence of information does not infer a sinister plot.
Because some dick leaked forensic photos to the press. It caused a diplomatic tiff between the UK and the USA.
Because that's a basic bit of information that is in the public interest to know and it won't compromise the criminal investigation. In face publicising his name may aid the investigation as people may come forward.
Is that really what is happening? Are bereaved parents now part of the plot? These are terrible human stories and there is a public appetite to hear the stories.
That is all part of the criminal investigation. It'll all end up in the public domain. As to the "why he was anle to cause...", well he was able to cause so much injury and death because he detonated a bomb in a crowd. Think about it.
originally posted by: JinMI
The sinister plot as you put it is the obvious narrative taking place in an attempt to either justify or cause a more authoritarian environment. See martial law and police state.
Why was he stopped and who stopped him? Where is their report or why were they not among the deceased?