It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The members get to decide what is taken seriously, not some overlord at Twitter, thats the whole point. Censorship is not what most want to see as a way forward.
originally posted by: Catalina22
would members think it was strange if The Onion was taken seriously? or would it be okay here?
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
The amount of obfuscation surrounding this topic really makes me think that there is something here that some do not want discovered.
The DNC is in this up to their necks.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
The amount of obfuscation surrounding this topic really makes me think that there is something here that some do not want discovered.
The DNC is in this up to their necks.
The DNC are idiots, they are doing the same thing they did during the presedential campaign, giving attention to the wrong subjects. They should have left this one alone and let it fade. Now the whole world looks on and sees them playing their game of cover up and wonders what they have to hide.
originally posted by: roadgravel
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
The amount of obfuscation surrounding this topic really makes me think that there is something here that some do not want discovered.
The DNC is in this up to their necks.
Pretty darn hard to not think along those lines. Each new twist to stop it makes it worse. Seems the hole keeps getting dug.
originally posted by: D8Tee
Social media lockdown commencing.
WMD tweeted and got themselves deleted.
Link
Oh, and how about the accusations from the Seth Rich family of Kim Dotcom trying to hack Seth's email? Yea right, cuz that's what Kim Dotcom is going to do at this point in time. You have to ask yourself, was this Seth Rich's family saying this, or was it the DNC handler Brad Baumann....
Oh, and lets get Hannity fired while we're at it.
Nobody is to speak of Seth Rich ever again....
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: D8Tee
WND is a disinfo/controlled opposition website, in my experience. Without taking this thread OT, I can say I had a very bad experience with Joseph Farah, a few years ago, and caught him covering for Obama. I had similar, but separate bad experiences with Jerome Corsi.
Farah, especially, is a thug though. I would bet everything I own on WND being disinfo/controlled opposition.
If WND is fielding the Seth Rich story, they are obfuscating something.
So, in that sense, I find this thread very interesting & revealing.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
The amount of obfuscation surrounding this topic really makes me think that there is something here that some do not want discovered.
The DNC is in this up to their necks.
ITA...and the fact that it's *allowed* to stay in some headlines makes me think it's a very-controllable story. Perhaps Seth's *hired* killer(s) are dead, too?
If there were really two people believed to be behind the actual murder...and a $100,000+ reward...I'd think one of them would come forward to make a deal to rat out the other and/or find an attorney to help them make a deal in exchange for their cooperation.
I think Seth's actual killer(s) are dead and this story is completely controllable....useful even.
originally posted by: Idreamofme
a reply to: D8Tee
I dont know why they are trying to silence everyone. Way too late for that. Everyone already put the pieces together.
You are saying that they asked to be censored? Why would they?
I obviously think it's telling that WND is now *appearing* as a victim of censorship because I don't trust them, at all.
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: MotherMayEye
You are saying that they asked to be censored? Why would they?
I obviously think it's telling that WND is now *appearing* as a victim of censorship because I don't trust them, at all.
I think its much deeper then just their necks and is way over their heads .Seth may have been the example that Podesta talked about because they didn't know who the leaker was . There is a very good chance that it was Eric Braverman but the DNC couldn't figure it out . The official Seath Rich story is paper thin and anytime you try to put your finger on it ,it goes right through . There may be good reason to think that some crucial information is on Debbie" Wasserman Schultz's LT .That would explain why the MSM are not wanting to talk about the Awan's and Seth Rich .
The amount of obfuscation surrounding this topic really makes me think that there is something here that some do not want discovered.