It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: PublicOpinion
I am still waiting for someone to say how a website that links to news stories, has copies of FOIA documents, and other assorted official documents is somehow...."debunked debunkery"
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: neutronflux
Misconceptions. Sure. Not.
That's a nice pile of hot air, Sky-TV!
a reply to: mrthumpy
911myths.com...
Debunked debunkery. I don't give 'em my clicks anymore, try another source.
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: pteridine
No, he is not assuming molten iron was present. His memory serves him well. 15 years ago the many media in NYC covered the story, with photos. The authorities applied Pyrocool to the area, and for the first time, Pyrocool failed to stop the heat.
That you and a few others are not aware of those news items 15 years ago shows failure on your part to be informed.
Something other than the NIST version is what actually happened. The only question is what happened since the NIST story fails?
originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: pteridine
Imagine that! Stories change and advertising writes good copy. Whether Pyrocool worked or not doesn't matter.
What matters is that the NIST story is impossible, 90 days of really hot # in the belly of the buildings did not come from burning office furnitures on the upper floors.
Something other than the NIST version is what actually happened. The only question is what happened since the NIST story fails?