It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: thunderfoot
a reply to: bob234arley
Everyone sees that the Grenfell tower not fall down, this is pure proof that WTC 7 was controlled demos. Now none of you can ever deny it anymore. There needs to be new investigation NOW>
originally posted by: bob234arley
Neutron how do you explain this though? The firefighters were eyewitnesses and they're in the line of work where they are able to make an educated guess about what was happening.
JAMES DUFFY ( Firefighter on the right)
Q. When either tower came down, did you
have any advanced warning?
A. Oh, no. I didn't know what it was when
we were inside. I didn't know the building had
collapsed, actually. I thought it was a bomb. I
thought a bomb had gone off. That's why I really
didn't know until after.
Q. Afterwards?
A. Yeah, that that's when it came down. I
wasn't expecting that. I thought it was a bomb
or something that went off.
FIREFIGHTER TYRONE JOHNSON (firefighter on the left)
At the time we were waiting for our
command to go to the Marriott. We went to the
Marriott. We got inside the lobby. The chief
told us take your gear off, relax, until you find
out what you want us to do.
Maybe 10 or 15 minutes later he gave us
the command put the gear on because we're getting
ready to head upstairs. There were about three
companies in front of us. We were the last
company to go up the steps. Maybe about five
minutes into the process of going up the steps,
that's when the building collapsed on us.
At that time we were thrown all around
the place. Guys were laying around, covered up.
I was messed up and covered up. Beams were
thrown. Guys were injured. Just maybe a quick
couple minutes -- it seems like a lifetime,
Architects and engineers proved that one was controlled demolitoin as well, maybe the same team that did the wtc's. Could have been micro nukes or thermite in the ceiling tiles, we're not really sure but one of them. Anybody thinks otherwise is just OS story believer that doesn't know about physics at all. I almost had a phd in it but had to leave the course, I know what i am talking of so don't try to argue you will lose it.
Highrise building in Tehran collapsed form fire induced structural failure.
Title: Tehran high-rise collapses after being engulfed by fire
Neutron how do you explain this though? The firefighters were eyewitnesses and they're in the line of work where they are able to make an educated guess about what was happening.
Architects and engineers proved that one was controlled demolitoin
Could have been micro nukes or thermite in the ceiling tiles, we're not really sure but one of them. Anybody thinks otherwise is just OS story believer that doesn't know about physics at all.
I almost had a phd in it but had to leave the course, I know what i am talking of so don't try to argue you will lose it.
This is way different than what dynamite would have done, don't you get it, directed mini nukes and dynamite behave much differently, but you wouldn't know, as you have admitted you aren't even close to phd let alone only one class short of it.
When you have a nuclear explosion you ALWAYS have a dynamic over pressure wave.
originally posted by: bob234arley
seems suspicious
originally posted by: capncrunch88
a reply to: samkent
The nukes could have been like directed and not blow outwards, anyone that would know how to design micro nukes could have done that. Just make the masses collide at an angle and the forces will go in that direction, you didn't think of that because you didn't take enough classes like i did. Or have one shock wave cancel another one out that would be another simple way to do it, but you guys with no experience in the mathematics behind it will try to argue, trust me, I had a lot of classes in just this kind of thing ok?
This is way different than what dynamite would have done, don't you get it, directed mini nukes and dynamite behave much differently, but you wouldn't know, as you have admitted you aren't even close to phd let alone only one class short of it.
When you have a nuclear explosion you ALWAYS have a dynamic over pressure wave.
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: capncrunch88
a reply to: samkent
The nukes could have been like directed and not blow outwards, anyone that would know how to design micro nukes could have done that. Just make the masses collide at an angle and the forces will go in that direction, you didn't think of that because you didn't take enough classes like i did. Or have one shock wave cancel another one out that would be another simple way to do it, but you guys with no experience in the mathematics behind it will try to argue, trust me, I had a lot of classes in just this kind of thing ok?
This is way different than what dynamite would have done, don't you get it, directed mini nukes and dynamite behave much differently, but you wouldn't know, as you have admitted you aren't even close to phd let alone only one class short of it.
When you have a nuclear explosion you ALWAYS have a dynamic over pressure wave.
Looking forward to reading your in depth explanation of how that would be achieved and benefitting from your authority on the subject
originally posted by: capncrunch88
no one but few could understand it anyways.
originally posted by: capncrunch88
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: capncrunch88
a reply to: samkent
The nukes could have been like directed and not blow outwards, anyone that would know how to design micro nukes could have done that. Just make the masses collide at an angle and the forces will go in that direction, you didn't think of that because you didn't take enough classes like i did. Or have one shock wave cancel another one out that would be another simple way to do it, but you guys with no experience in the mathematics behind it will try to argue, trust me, I had a lot of classes in just this kind of thing ok?
This is way different than what dynamite would have done, don't you get it, directed mini nukes and dynamite behave much differently, but you wouldn't know, as you have admitted you aren't even close to phd let alone only one class short of it.
When you have a nuclear explosion you ALWAYS have a dynamic over pressure wave.
Looking forward to reading your in depth explanation of how that would be achieved and benefitting from your authority on the subject
Thank you, I won't go too deep as most people wouldn't follow the complexities of the math involved. You know how a gun type nuke works probalby.
It's really quite simple, two highly enriched chunks of uranium fired at high speed towards each other. What I think they did here was more than two pieces, so when they all collide and make a critical mass, they direct their energy in one direction only. That way they can all be alligned to cancel each other out. It's simple geometry really, anyone could set it up now with computers that knew how to make a good code. The sound and pressure waves would cancel when they hit each other so nobody would know that it was nukes.
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: capncrunch88
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: capncrunch88
a reply to: samkent
The nukes could have been like directed and not blow outwards, anyone that would know how to design micro nukes could have done that. Just make the masses collide at an angle and the forces will go in that direction, you didn't think of that because you didn't take enough classes like i did. Or have one shock wave cancel another one out that would be another simple way to do it, but you guys with no experience in the mathematics behind it will try to argue, trust me, I had a lot of classes in just this kind of thing ok?
This is way different than what dynamite would have done, don't you get it, directed mini nukes and dynamite behave much differently, but you wouldn't know, as you have admitted you aren't even close to phd let alone only one class short of it.
When you have a nuclear explosion you ALWAYS have a dynamic over pressure wave.
Looking forward to reading your in depth explanation of how that would be achieved and benefitting from your authority on the subject
Thank you, I won't go too deep as most people wouldn't follow the complexities of the math involved. You know how a gun type nuke works probalby.
No. Can you explain that
originally posted by: capncrunch88
It's really quite simple, two highly enriched chunks of uranium fired at high speed towards each other. What I think they did here was more than two pieces, so when they all collide and make a critical mass, they direct their energy in one direction only. That way they can all be alligned to cancel each other out. It's simple geometry really, anyone could set it up now with computers that knew how to make a good code. The sound and pressure waves would cancel when they hit each other so nobody would know that it was nukes.
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: capncrunch88
originally posted by: mrthumpy
originally posted by: capncrunch88
a reply to: samkent
The nukes could have been like directed and not blow outwards, anyone that would know how to design micro nukes could have done that. Just make the masses collide at an angle and the forces will go in that direction, you didn't think of that because you didn't take enough classes like i did. Or have one shock wave cancel another one out that would be another simple way to do it, but you guys with no experience in the mathematics behind it will try to argue, trust me, I had a lot of classes in just this kind of thing ok?
This is way different than what dynamite would have done, don't you get it, directed mini nukes and dynamite behave much differently, but you wouldn't know, as you have admitted you aren't even close to phd let alone only one class short of it.
When you have a nuclear explosion you ALWAYS have a dynamic over pressure wave.
Looking forward to reading your in depth explanation of how that would be achieved and benefitting from your authority on the subject
Thank you, I won't go too deep as most people wouldn't follow the complexities of the math involved. You know how a gun type nuke works probalby.
No. Can you explain that
I won't get into the maths, but if you have more than two chunks colliding, you don't need as much material of course, so you can make them minier than normal makes sense right? Even if you don't know much about it, you have to follow the simple way I described it quite easy.