It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Salander
Why would a nuke bomb create molten iron for 90 days?
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Salander
Why would a nuke bomb create molten iron for 90 days?
Because we all know jet fuel will create molten iron for 90 days. 9/11 invented new laws of physics.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Salander
Why would a nuke bomb create molten iron for 90 days?
Because we all know jet fuel will create molten iron for 90 days. 9/11 invented new laws of physics.
rather than partially supporting the structure long enough to pad the collapse.
Does anyone know if the firefighters, police, city emergency response, ERs had the ability to check for contamination from a dirty bomb on 9/11? If they checked for contamination through the city emergency response crews
Within minutes of the crash, McKinney sent a radiological health inspector to check the site for any radiation sources. He reached Richard Borri, a senior scientist in the department’s office of Radiological Health, who like most people from DOH, was on his way to work when the first tower was hit.
While I was walking down Church Street, with all my instruments, I came within 1000 feet of the South Tower, and unfortunately the building came down,” says Borri, sounding every bit the unruffled scientist. “It’s a good thing I walked slowly.”
That was fortunately not the case, Borri found, using a portable liquid scintillation counter, which measures radioactivity like a Geiger counter. The high-tech portable gadget he carried, one of the few available in the United States, is far more precise than its century-old cousin, the Geiger, counter with a much more refined ability to detect any kind of radioactivity.
Although Borri didn’t turn up any problematic radioactive readings by the end of the day, his work would be supplemented by the federal Department of Energy, whose technicians remained on site and continued to sample. [Only during the last days of the Ground Zero cleanup would radioactive testers find any evidence of radioactive emissions, from a pharmacy laboratory located within one of the buildings.]
In late 2001, while in Pakistan, Faris went to a travel agency to have some expired airline tickets to Yemen re-issued for several unknown colleagues. He claimed to be a preacher from Tablighi Jamaat, a missionary group.
In early 2002, Faris was introduced to an operative identified only as "C-2". He learned of a plot allegedly involving the simultaneous destruction of the Brooklyn Bridge by cutting through cables with blowtorches, and a second group that would derail a train in Washington D.C. Faris' investigations into obtaining the necessary tools for the dual-operation involved asking a friend where he might purchase welding equipment, and researching the structure of the bridge on the internet. He concluded that the operation was unlikely, and allegedly sent a message back to Pakistan calling off the plot, stating that "The weather is too hot".
Leslie Robertson, one of the structural engineers responsible for the design of the WTC, describes fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: neutronflux
Leslie Robertson, one of the structural engineers responsible for the design of the WTC, describes fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks.
Context of 'September 12, 2001-February 2002: Witnesses See Molten Metal in the Remains at Ground Zero'
I really have to wonder... are you kids just innocent, but dumb as eff, or simply unwilling to do some basic research?
911myths.com...
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: neutronflux
Misconceptions. Sure. Not.
That's a nice pile of hot air, Sky-TV!
a reply to: mrthumpy
911myths.com...
Debunked debunkery. I don't give 'em my clicks anymore, try another source.