It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

There is evidence Seth Rich had contact with WikiLeaks prior to death

page: 11
77
<< 8  9  10   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 23 2017 @ 03:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Mousygretchen




And guccifer said "the name of my source is seth".
Anyone have a source for this?

eta: Seems to be some dispute about the authenticity of this.

Haven't had time to pursue it, maybe tommorow...
Link
Chat hoax article

edit on 23-5-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)




posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:40 AM
link   
Deep breath before anyone responds: if Richard had stolen some emails and forwarded them to WikiLeaks, why would anyone murder him? The DNC could just claim they were fake. The only reason the DNC would admit they were real is because they wanted people to be aware of the threat to national security. They had already been warned of Russia's intent to tamper.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001
Deep breath before anyone responds: if Richard had stolen some emails and forwarded them to WikiLeaks, why would anyone murder him? The DNC could just claim they were fake. The only reason the DNC would admit they were real is because they wanted people to be aware of the threat to national security. They had already been warned of Russia's intent to tamper.


Already covered. Kill him and take all his computer equipment. Bury evidence of where the leak actually came from and blame Russia. They knew enough idiots would fall for the Russia story.
edit on 23/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:56 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth


Kill him and take all his computer equipment.


Why? Is "all his computer equipment" missing? And why not claim that it is all lies, and threaten to charge him with theft if Richard offers proof otherwise? When information obtained illegally is published, the journalist or leaker can be punished, not the publisher. Get it?


Bury evidence of where the leak actually came from and blame Russia.


Why not just call it "fake news" and forget about it. If the omnipotent DNC is controlling all the world's media, why was the story even reported by anyone other than RT? The more you look at it,the more Russia's "alt-facts" fall apart.




top topics
 
77
<< 8  9  10   >>

log in

join