Macron Condemns 'Massive' Hacking Attack as Documents Leaked Online

Lots of BS flying with these "leaks".

Also, from WL Twitter:

NPR is not a credible news organization.
1) WikiLeaks did not publish #MacronLeaks 2) So far only Macron claims "fake docs"--but names none

originally posted by: dreamingawake
Lots of BS flying with these "leaks".

Also, from WL Twitter:

NPR is not a credible news organization.
1) WikiLeaks did not publish #MacronLeaks 2) So far only Macron claims "fake docs"--but names none

If WikiLeaks accuses NPR of not being credible, it means NPR is a threat to their pro-Russian agenda. The documents were released less than 48 hours ago and are thousands of "pages" long. There has not been enough to read them all, much less fact check them.

a reply to: dreamingawake

NPR is one of the most respected news sources available.
They are trying to discredit them because they're a threat.




Oops no I'm not a copy cat DWJ. Brilliant minds lol.

a reply to: UnBreakable

The final poll predicted Hillary would win the popular vote by 2.1% and it was spot on.

originally posted by: surnamename57

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: surnamename57

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: gortex

Has his opponent also been hacked? If not, boy this situation sounds very familiar. One sided hacks against political figures is very lame and unfair.

Give it a God damn rest !

Hackers attack the weakly configured sites, starting with Hillary's extremely poor security measures.

Macron is more of the mental midget same.

So they are doing it just for sports to entertain themselves? Thanks for making me laughing.

Yes, hackers DO engage in this to entertain themselves, as they like an intellectual challenge...

Are you calling any malignant feeling or behavior an intellectual challenge? Thanks for making me laughing again.

Clearly, you do not understand the level of intellectual challenge in hacking, way above your mental abilities....

a reply to: M5xaz

You are a great source of laughter. Bravo!

a reply to: surnamename57

i was more interested in your answer. thats why i asked you.
but you dont appear to have one.
no suprise.
so to follow the logic of your last post
"Try to answer your question yourself. If you can't then it's a stupid question."
oh there doesnt appear to be any logic!
are you sure its the question thats stupid?
perhaps its the recipient of the question..

a reply to: DJW001

sorry, lost you there.... whats this pro russian agenda?
perhaps you could post some evidence of this for us?

a reply to: username74

I answered you once already, but my answer seems to not have been the one you were expecting. Some childish desire inside you was not fulfilled and you want to shout out your discontent. Go ahead. No worries.

a reply to: surnamename57

no you didnt, you told me to ask myself, and if i couldnt it was a stupid question!
you cant answer a question with a counter question!
what age are you ?
are you an adult yet?

originally posted by: username74
a reply to: surnamename57

no you didnt, you told me to ask myself, and if i couldnt it was a stupid question!
you cant answer a question with a counter question!
what age are you ?
are you an adult yet?

So, you nervy little boy, enough is never enough for you?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: dreamingawake

NPR is one of the most respected news sources available.

Hahahaha!!!!!.....
Bwhahahaha!!!!
Respected by who?
The average IQ handicapped overweight American who doesn't even know how many branches of government we have? Who listens to NPR in a vain attempt to stay in the know between professional sports games and episodes of dancing with the stars?
Yeeeah sorry but just because the ignorant masses say "respected" doesn't make it so. Besides by in large the Nazi propaganda mechanism that lead to genocide was largely respected by the German people. We all know how that ended up.
I will continue to get my news from small independent individuals like Tim Pool and the other real investigative journalists. Not some talking mouthpiece who's salary is given by someone or something that has an agenda and a narrative to fill.

Respected does not equate to legitimate.
Much like education does not equate to intelligence.

a reply to: surnamename57

#ing nonsense, thats all thats coming out here, its all youve got!
why dont you try and contribute instead of derailing the subject matter.

originally posted by: username74
a reply to: surnamename57

#ing nonsense...

Really? How about asking questions in a less arrogant way to avoid answers that reflect your manners rather than address your questions?

I don’t want to sound preachy, but I think you need to become aware of what you are lacking, since you seem to be so confused.

From now on I am ignoring you.

I think we all benefit from a more divided Europe. Depends on your definition of divided and its level.

a reply to: KiwiNite

a reply to: gortex

French gov. cyber defense head to AP: No trace of notorious Russian hacking group in attack on Macron election campaign

originally posted by: username74
a reply to: DJW001

sorry, lost you there.... whats this pro russian agenda?
perhaps you could post some evidence of this for us?

Please list all of the Russian documents WikiLeaks has published.

originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: gortex

French gov. cyber defense head to AP: No trace of notorious Russian hacking group in attack on Macron election campaign

I can't get the video to load, but the statement seems to suggest that he was talking about a specific group.

a reply to: DJW001

Can't link to wikileaks ... fill the URL by yourself :

.../wiki/Category:Russia

a reply to: DJW001

What they don't "seems to suggest" but state clearly is that the Russians are not the ones that should be blamed ...
Despite the US previous fingerpointing :

US official says France warned about Russian hacking before Macron leak

With more and more US hack tools being published and their "Russian framing" ability being now known by IT forensics services, it is normal that the previous US lies are less and less taken for granted.