It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jimmyx
what part of "not at this time" do people not understand....it's under investigation, which means she can't say until the investigation is concluded....
originally posted by: Ohanka
Clearly this increasingly farcical investigation is a monumental waste of state resources.
I say if these idiot senators want to investigate a non existent plot to satisfy their joint hatred for Trump and the Russian people then they should pay for it with their own money.
Stop wasting the government's time.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Clapper and Yates just re-iterated in today's briefing there is no evidence of collusion with Russia and Trump.
But there is a trail to follow on how Trump's name was unmasked and revealed to a journalist. It's still apparently unknown who unmasked Trump and who leaked it.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: jjkenobi
Susan Rice requested the unmasking, and likely she is the one who steered somebody in the right direction to "obtain" the names.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: jjkenobi
Susan Rice requested the unmasking, and likely she is the one who steered somebody in the right direction to "obtain" the names.
Did that just come out in the briefing? Because Clapper just testified he has no knowledge of who unmasked it. He also did not know how many people could request unmasking in the govt.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: jjkenobi
Susan Rice requested the unmasking, and likely she is the one who steered somebody in the right direction to "obtain" the names.
Did that just come out in the briefing? Because Clapper just testified he has no knowledge of who unmasked it. He also did not know how many people could request unmasking in the govt.