It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
Go on lamenting about your identity, slapping people in the mouth when they confuse you for a man in a dress.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
Go on lamenting about your identity, slapping people in the mouth when they confuse you for a man in a dress.
Unlike you, who will merely continue to lament about the lamentation of others hiding behind a keyboard?
Pfft.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
You can do what you want, including calling yourself a woman despite the obvious.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: RainbowPhoenix
Go on lamenting about your identity, slapping people in the mouth when they confuse you for a man in a dress.
Unlike you, who will merely continue to lament about the lamentation of others hiding behind a keyboard?
Pfft.
I bet we're speaking about your own projections, which is a common occurrence.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
I would bet on it.
Someone's gender identity doesn't affect me, and I never claimed otherwise. As is evidenced by my posts, what concerns me is violence against speech and thought.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
I would bet on it.
Someone's gender identity doesn't affect me, and I never claimed otherwise. As is evidenced by my posts, what concerns me is violence against speech and thought.
Violence against speech? Pfft.
You're continually arguing, berating, and whining about what you conceive as the whining or complaints of others. If you really believed in free speech, you wouldn't need to comment on their speech, nor would you need to constantly bemoan their positions.
You're regularly participating in what you claim to dislike ... rather hypocritical, eh?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Gryphon66
To be fair, dialogue is what its all about. He is saying he prefers the pen over the sword, and would prefer that for humanity.
I can't find a reason to argue against him in that regard. I think you just didn't agree with what he said. You should argue against that instead, as at least that gives you something reasonable to argue against.
FWIW.
It can't be stressed how often people ignore this point. Freedom of Speech ONLY (I cannot stress this word enough) applies to the government infringing it. Everything else is open game.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
Dialogue as a weapon? I use dialogue as dialogue, actually. There goes that projection again. Your weapons are as dull as a spoon.
To be fair, dialogue is what its all about. He is saying he prefers the pen over the sword, and would prefer that for humanity.