It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: carewemust
The source of that Zerohedge article you linked, Yonhap is apparently not reporting accurate news. The defense article I linked said the claim was flatly denied.
Officials did, however, flatly deny reports that three U.S. carrier strike groups were being directed to mass off the Korean peninsula in a few weeks.
Speculation has been rising that the Ronald Reagan and Nimitz strike groups could join with the Vinson. The Japan-based carrier Reagan, however, is in a maintenance period at Yokosuka scheduled to complete in May. The Bremerton, Washington-based Nimitz and her strike group is off Southern California, nearing the completion of its major pre-deployment exercise. The ship is scheduled to deploy this spring to relieve the Vinson in the Western Pacific.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: whywhynot
But we can't (and shouldn't) commit to maintaining 3 battle-groups in that region, just to keep Kim Jong pinned to the mat. His rein will outlast the next 5 or 6 U.S. Presidents.
originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: carewemust
Yup.
Officials did, however, flatly deny reports that three U.S. carrier strike groups were being directed to mass off the Korean peninsula in a few weeks.
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: carewemust
Yup.
Officials did, however, flatly deny reports that three U.S. carrier strike groups were being directed to mass off the Korean peninsula in a few weeks.
First three rules of intel 1) deny. 2). Deny. 3). DENY
originally posted by: carewemust
With no ocean-based battle "armadas" in the area for another week, what could the U.S. do if fat boy tested a nuclear weapon between now and then? We're talking pretty tough. Can we back it up right now?