It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Yeticha
well one piece of evidence can be found HERE
this is just one of several pieces of evidence i have collected....and don't tell me that this is a lie because i believe a world leader has more knowledge than anyone here.
Originally posted by Yeticha
i have read all your propaganda so many times in the past that it is like a broken record...the only fact is that gay sex, giving a gay person hiv tainted blood, or sharing a needle infected with hiv with a gay person causes hiv/aids.
Originally posted by Yeticha
i have published scores of reports about this gay disease and you wouldn't believe the positive responses i've got....and by positive i don't mean gay....if people are believing geneticists from illinois i do not know what the world has come to... you people that spread the lie that hiv/aids strikes heterosexuals sound like you have a doctorate from the University of Goebbels.
Speaking through a translator, Gadhafi drew some laughter with his reference to AIDS as an illness only affecting homosexuals.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta says that HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, is spread by an infected person through heterosexual or homosexual sexual contact, the sharing of needles or syringes and, less commonly, through transfusions of contaminated blood or blood clotting factors.
Originally posted by baw333
I just joined this site and have read many great posts but reading some of these makes me kind of ill. Are there really people out there that think you can only get HIV if you’re gay? Please tell me i'm reading some of these wrong.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
The responses from the self-congratulatory DENY IGNORNANCE crowd have truly been the most entertaining.
Self-congratulatory? What's wrong Joe, are you one of those people who thinks research and rational presentation of a factual arguement is somehow pretentious? If I could live a day longer for each time somebody gave me flak for bothering them with the facts, then I sht you not I'd be the one to bury Cain and the Wandering Jew. (I sure hope somebody gets that or I'm gonna feel really alone here.)
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
You didn't make it to the DI self-congrad list!
The DI list doesn't make that step. But, that isn't my point. I personally believe HIV/AIDs and a few others are poison pills for virtually everyone. However, like Anthrax and a few other mass killers some seemed to have been immune.
I recollect reading somewhere that when the great plagues swept Eurasia hundreds of years past some groups were barely affected while other groups were devastated.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
Funny you mention that. Something like 10% of Europeans have a gene that is resistant somehow, but it's only homozygous in 1%. I'm not a geneticist so I'm really just regurgitating this with only a partial understanding, but what it basically means is that something like 1% of Europeans have a strong (but not perfect) resistance to HIV-1.
Originally posted by JoeDoaks
Things like this always perplex me. i remember a few years back when DNA and genes were 'new.' Seemed like all other science related to humans went into the closet at the time.
Seems logical (I don't like logic btw) to me that blood types and other attributes of human differences exist for a purpose. Survival is the ultimate purpose of nature (I believe).
Hair, skin, size, body build, eye color, selective muscle development- all have the same characteristics as blood type. Some humans can survive and flourish in environments that others die in.
Originally posted by creamsoda
LOL...gosh, that is runny, I mean funny. Wasnt it just chlamidia and warts that mostly affected gay people down there? Or was it AIDS, cant remember. I went into Life Mangament Skills in 9th grade and had some of this crap brought up to me. But ive never heard of anything like this. I've seen some discusting pictures, probably why I dont eat coliflower anymore.