It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: mrthumpy
I already did. this is the 3rd or 4th time you're refusing to respond to my direct questions.
you've had ample opportunity here to state what you think and why you think so. you refused to do so with every opportunity you had.
you're not posting in these threads to genuinely learn more about this situation. you very clearly have your own motives.
at least that's now clear to everyone reading this.
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: DickBrisket
a reply to: pale5218
I was at the Pentagon...Did Presidential Security from 1999 to 2004. All the conspiracy theories are B.S. PERIOD. Regardless, all the "Experts" who've been living in their parent's basements polishing their participation trophies will scream otherwise. You know...cause they weren't there and I was. Do not suffer fools.
Well I was right there outside the Pentagon in plain view of the impact site and I did indeed see a MISSILE hit the Pentagon.
Sure you did.
Can you describe the missile?
Can you explain how all the bodies of the 757 passengers were found inside the Pentagon?
Do you realize that a missile would have provided a very different explosive event?
Do you realize that an airliner filled with Jet-A is much more damaging than any extant non-nuclear armed missile?
originally posted by: facedye
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: facedye
Bottom corner camera, is pointing at a parking area, away from the impact point. Center camera, pointed at the helipad, again, not at the impact point. Camera on top, pointed, again, away from the impact point. The primary security of the Pentagon, was the Pentagon Police force, NOT the cameras.
you're attempting to misdirect everyone here by expecting them to believe that while the below testimony was taking place, all of the cameras we can see in the photos above were NOT focused on the imminent threat. this is funny, illogical, and makes me highly suspicious of you.
please post any kind of source or cited material so we can all review that together. you talk like you've seen the tapes for yourself. i'm intrigued , and will kindly ask you again to provide the substantive source for what you just said.
I'm now thinking Norm was not accurate in his testimony!
originally posted by: facedye
a reply to: pale5218
I'm now thinking Norm was not accurate in his testimony!
or... he was absolutely accurate, and IAD wasn't privy to the same details dick cheney was privy to.
the "50 miles out.. 30 miles out... 10 miles out" quotation is not attributed to mineta himself, rather it's what he heard being reported to cheney by military personnel.
this is why i think the 9/11 war games challenge the information in your OP.
originally posted by: facedye
I don't think those are the only two options.
Norman mineta's testimony was not false.
If you don't already know, please dig into the secret service responsibilities that cheney was in direct control of on that morning. Please also take a hard look at how that relates to NORAD.
Again, his testimony was not false, nor incorrect.
It is certainly possible that he could be telling the truth but I have not seen anything that supports his testimony.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Any kind of speed, as in with speed higher than landing speed. But just for you:
It does wonders for the argument that they can't fly in ground effect at high speed.
Satisfied?
If it had started straight and level and pushed the throttles forward, then there's no way it would have reached that speed. But it didn't. It dove from higher altitude, and then leveled off as they advanced the throttles to the firewall. It still had some downward momentum to push the speed higher. If they had flown level long enough they would have slowed down.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Salander
Citing P4911Truth, is like relying on CNN. Sorry, long ago the founder Rob Balsamo was run off of ATS for spouting his nonsense.