It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Another alarmist hitpiece by the leftist press. Like all of them, it will turn out to be nothing with no wrong doing.
The last time it broke that a member of Trump's administration lied about talking to Russia, he resigned in disgrace.
Trump fired him for lying to the vice-pres, not for talking to a Russian ambassador.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: TheBulk
I find these hysterics mind boggling coming from the left seeing as how it was Democrats and their media who were fawning over Castro when he died. It's left wingers and Democrats carrying around hammer and sickle flags at protests. It's left wingers and Democrats who subscribe to communism.
Confused...ignoring the bizarre conflation of Democrats and Castro..What does that have to do with the topic?
So...Democrats should be pro-Russian espionage and election interference in the USA?
Or are you saying you are?
Castro + Democrats?
So Russian interference in US elections = Good?
???
You need to improve your derail/straw-man BS.
originally posted by: GAB4754
a reply to: knoxie
Why mention it if he wasn't asked about it? They Dems would get in a fit if he did because they are children and try to stop him from getting confirmed for no reason.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: GAB4754
a reply to: knoxie
Why mention it if he wasn't asked about it? They Dems would get in a fit if he did because they are children and try to stop him from getting confirmed for no reason.
Perhaps you should clarify that it was no reason that concerned you.
His blatant RACIST past (yes, you're correct, that's not only the race card but the whole race deck) past concerns many.
originally posted by: TheBulk
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Indigo5
Why lie?
Exactly! Why are conservatives resisting finding out the answer to this question so badly?
Because it's obvious b******* you guys are using to try and overturn a democratic election.
originally posted by: TheBulk
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: GAB4754
a reply to: knoxie
Why mention it if he wasn't asked about it? They Dems would get in a fit if he did because they are children and try to stop him from getting confirmed for no reason.
Perhaps you should clarify that it was no reason that concerned you.
His blatant RACIST past (yes, you're correct, that's not only the race card but the whole race deck) past concerns many.
Yes he's so racist the black caucus gave him an award.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Another alarmist hitpiece by the leftist press. Like all of them, it will turn out to be nothing with no wrong doing.
The last time it broke that a member of Trump's administration lied about talking to Russia, he resigned in disgrace.
Trump fired him for lying to the vice-pres, not for talking to a Russian ambassador.
originally posted by: TheBulk
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Indigo5
Why lie?
Exactly! Why are conservatives resisting finding out the answer to this question so badly?
Because it's obvious b******* you guys are using to try and overturn a democratic election.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Spying on us citizens at the behest of those empowered to get fisa warrents is now ok?
Look I get that you do not like sessions. I personally think he is a hillbilly pos. I DO NOT want that guy as AG.
What I also do not want is a move to allow our ic to be used against us. That is in no way acceptable. There are freedoms in our country that are worth much more than a petty political victory(which is all this will be if it even amounts to that).
Let me put it this way...if the same "concerned" leakers in the ic had ANY info that pointed to ANY shenanigans with respect to the 2016 election would they have not leaked it? We would ALL want to know about that right? At that point it is not even a leak right it is being a whistleblower. Why hasn't that info been leaked? All we have from "un named" sources is petty he said she said crap. Nothing even worth filing charges over in the case of flynn.