Steve Clemmons tweets Secret Service Agents fired and escorted out

a reply to: D8Tee

Oh come on...Really dude?

Yeah it's fake news. OMG face palm AND shaking head.

a reply to: D8Tee

I think it's time that Trump is allowed to hire his own security detail.

Yeah! They can take an oath of personal loyalty and wear black shirts with a Trump logo armband.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: D8Tee

Oh come on...Really dude?

Yeah it's fake news. OMG face palm AND shaking head.

I think Bannon has resorted to using "fake leaks" to manipulate the media into discrediting themselves.

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Byrd

Personally, I don't think there ever was a leak close to the POTUS. I've seen lots of fake news stories from unnamed sources, but nothing solid at all. Like the phone calls to Mexico and Australia. Fake news with no way of checking any sources, it shouldn't have even been reported by any newsoutlets... but it was.

Correct. The FAKE NEWS organisation CNN still managed to lie about the Mexico call after a Mexican official actually listening to the call told them their story taken from AP was wrong. Their panel decided they were right and the official was making it up. So, don't bother listening to a person actually witnessing an event, just go with the propaganda. That is CNN for you. Fake.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: D8Tee


Oh come on...Really dude?

Yeah it's fake news. OMG face palm AND shaking head.

I think Bannon has resorted to using "fake leaks" to manipulate the media into discrediting themselves.

The Trump administration is using the same tactics the far progressive left we're using....

Change the language, regardless if it's truth or not, it becomes truth

Call it fake and unfair every chance you get and eventually just say "fake news" to everything immediately discredits and makes his supporters not look into it any further

For me it just makes me dig deeper , sometimes it IS false but more often than not it's not , or it does have events of truth...

But as many under the obama administration did, just taking his word for it ( not taking pot shots here) a huge portion of Trumps supporters just take his or his people's word for it

a reply to: UKTruth

Fake leak.

So. You maintain that it is legitimate to swear to protect a person in office, no matter whether you suspect that person is only in that office so they can abuse it, or not?

Bull.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth

Fake leak.

Nope. I watched the Mexican official actually on the call being interviewed relay exactly what he heard.

You can go with your fake news all you like, but reality wins. You might like to try it.

a reply to: UKTruth

You can go with your fake news all you like, but reality wins. You might like to try it.

I agree: reality wins, no matter what you say to the contrary.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth

You can go with your fake news all you like, but reality wins. You might like to try it.

I agree: reality wins, no matter what you say to the contrary.

Yep, and I just posted a video of a person actually on the call telling us what was said and the outcome of the call.
That is the reality.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
So. You maintain that it is legitimate to swear to protect a person in office, no matter whether you suspect that person is only in that office so they can abuse it, or not?

Bull.

Yes, I believe that feelings and politics should be kept out of professional life. If you train, educate yourself and eventually sign up to do a job that requires you to take an oath, you don't get to just not do your job because you have some petty personal disagreement.

Why did you duck my question? How is this any different to a cop (sworn to uphold the public) deciding not to protect you (member of the public) because he has some personal belief that doesn't align with yours (doesn't like long-haired men). Would you condone this? If not, why do you think this is OK?

Is it because Trump??

Even criminals have a right to protection to some degree.

Please stop trying to maintain the moral high ground after suggesting the democratically elected president of the US should be murdered with a hammer because you disagree with his opinion.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Social.security???? Social security agents????

Once is surely enough.
Three times is just overkill.

This space available. Call your local representative for details.

This is a recording...

a reply to: UKTruth

Do you guys realise that every official call he makes and every e mail and every letter and every meeting is recorded and becomes part of the pubic record?
You can get the details with a foia request.

a reply to: TrueBrit

That's the job. Those who can't perform those duties should not apply for the job.
It's protect the office of the presidency...You don't have to like the president.

a reply to: UKTruth

And you believe this is fake why?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

And you believe this is fake why?

...comment was ref Mexico call.
Still waiting for more on the SS agents.

originally posted by: D8Tee
Interesting.
I think it's time that Trump is allowed to hire his own security detail.

Maybe they'll look like these guys:

starwars.wikia.com...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Do you guys realise that every official call he makes and every e mail and every letter and every meeting is recorded and becomes part of the pubic record?
You can get the details with a foia request.

Actually, he's been caught deleting tweets (which is why there's now a server that collects all his tweets) and he did have the recording shut off for his call with Putin. (at least, according to sources)