It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner
So what you are saying, is that you think it is appropriate to swear an oath that could, one day, make you complicit in crimes against the people, by way of your preventing a just removal of a tyrant? What manner of freedom hating bastard would take that job?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Khaleesi
And everyone who did that was complicit in his crimes, were they not?
See that is the thing. The oath should go like this:
As long as *insert name of President* continues to serve the interests of all the American people and all its States, I will protect him/her with my life.
This means that the named individual is under their protection, until the individual swearing the oath believes that they are no longer in service of the people. When they make choices that conflict with the wishes and needs of the electorate, the protection goes away.
Do you guys realise that every official call he makes and every e mail and every letter and every meeting is recorded and becomes part of the pubic record? You can get the details with a foia request.
Actually, he's been caught deleting tweets (which is why there's now a server that collects all his tweets) and he did have the recording shut off for his call with Putin. (at least, according to sources)
originally posted by: Khaleesi
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
This is not the mudpit. Please do not change Trump's name to satisfy your hatred for him. Go after the man for what he does or does not do. I hope we are all older than 12 and above name calling and other juvenile things.
originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
originally posted by: Khaleesi
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
This is not the mudpit. Please do not change Trump's name to satisfy your hatred for him. Go after the man for what he does or does not do. I hope we are all older than 12 and above name calling and other juvenile things.
Care to quote where I changed his name in this thread at all?
3 stars on your post for this comment and it's not even accurate
Sad
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner
So what you are saying, is that you think it is appropriate to swear an oath that could, one day, make you complicit in crimes against the people, by way of your preventing a just removal of a tyrant? What manner of freedom hating bastard would take that job?
UPDATE: REPORT DENIED: Secret Service Managers Fired, Escorted from White House Grounds
Kristinn Taylor Feb 3rd, 2017 12:47 am 611 Comments
UPDATE: The Secret Service has branded the report by reporter Steve Clemons that at least two managers were forced to resign overnight as “absolutely false”, the Washington Examiner reported. Friday morning.
Clemons corrected and clarified his reports to now state that officials with White House cyber security were forced out. His new tweets have been added at the end of this article.
“The report regarding the Secret Service personnel is absolutely false,” an agency spokeswoman said Friday.
She referred all further questions to the White House press office, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: Xcathdra
Oh really?,my sister was a SS agent,also head administrator,her duty was to protect whomever they were ordered to protect which meant to be a shield,so yes that is their duty,funny how some libs become instant attys,and my brother in law worked for them as well,how he met my sister,do your job and you won't get fired