It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Steve Clemmons tweets Secret Service Agents fired and escorted out

page: 3
12
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 08:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: D8Tee

Oh come on...Really dude?

Yeah it's fake news. OMG face palm AND shaking head.


Do you find it ironic that we're saying Trump actually didn't do this? I do!




posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 09:36 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

It depends on whether the person in office is worth defending ? Wth? I thought everyone had a right to have their life protected .. and especially in highest political office.

What next ... law enforcement deciding who is worth protecting and who isn't ?

Trump admin is correct in asking for resignations from all those who are secretly saying they will not do their job. The secret service needs to be cleaned up anyhow. Remember reading about all the partying with coc aine and hookers some were involved in ,under Obama admin.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

This is not the mudpit. Please do not change Trump's name to satisfy your hatred for him. Go after the man for what he does or does not do. I hope we are all older than 12 and above name calling and other juvenile things.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner

So what you are saying, is that you think it is appropriate to swear an oath that could, one day, make you complicit in crimes against the people, by way of your preventing a just removal of a tyrant? What manner of freedom hating bastard would take that job?



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner

So what you are saying, is that you think it is appropriate to swear an oath that could, one day, make you complicit in crimes against the people, by way of your preventing a just removal of a tyrant? What manner of freedom hating bastard would take that job?


If Trump or anyone for that matter gave an order that was unconstitutional or asked someone to do something illegal, they would have the right to refuse an unlawful order. Actually swearing an oath to a specific person by name would open up a whole other can of worms. That is what Hitler did. He had them swear an oath to him instead of to their country and constitution.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001




I think Bannon has resorted to using "fake leaks" to manipulate the media into discrediting themselves.

They already did that during the campaign. Some continue to do it nightly.
But you believe bannon is responsible .....



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Khaleesi

And everyone who did that was complicit in his crimes, were they not?

See that is the thing. The oath should go like this:

As long as *insert name of President* continues to serve the interests of all the American people and all its States, I will protect him/her with my life.

This means that the named individual is under their protection, until the individual swearing the oath believes that they are no longer in service of the people. When they make choices that conflict with the wishes and needs of the electorate, the protection goes away.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Khaleesi

And everyone who did that was complicit in his crimes, were they not?

See that is the thing. The oath should go like this:

As long as *insert name of President* continues to serve the interests of all the American people and all its States, I will protect him/her with my life.

This means that the named individual is under their protection, until the individual swearing the oath believes that they are no longer in service of the people. When they make choices that conflict with the wishes and needs of the electorate, the protection goes away.


They already have the right to disobey an unlawful order. What you are suggesting means they can decide based on a simple disagreement on policies.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

hah!
Sorry!
That's what happens typing on a tiny phone screen.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




Do you guys realise that every official call he makes and every e mail and every letter and every meeting is recorded and becomes part of the pubic record? You can get the details with a foia request.

Unless it gets wiped, shredded, forgotten about, or otherwise obstructed.

You know, like with a cloth or something........



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Byrd




Actually, he's been caught deleting tweets (which is why there's now a server that collects all his tweets) and he did have the recording shut off for his call with Putin. (at least, according to sources)

I am glad someone is paying attention to info that SHOULD be easily accessable with a foia request.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Khaleesi
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

This is not the mudpit. Please do not change Trump's name to satisfy your hatred for him. Go after the man for what he does or does not do. I hope we are all older than 12 and above name calling and other juvenile things.



Edit:

Apparently I had a typo , my apologies for that... it was extremely late and on my iPhone!


edit on 2/3/2017 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: Khaleesi
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask

This is not the mudpit. Please do not change Trump's name to satisfy your hatred for him. Go after the man for what he does or does not do. I hope we are all older than 12 and above name calling and other juvenile things.



Care to quote where I changed his name in this thread at all?

3 stars on your post for this comment and it's not even accurate

Sad


Your 'typo' has been corrected by Justmike so I can no longer access what you originally posted but you typed 'rump administration' instead of Trump administration. Your longstanding hatred of Trump led me to believe it was intentional. If it truly was a typo, you have my apologies.


edit on 3-2-2017 by Khaleesi because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:34 AM
link   
a reply to: Khaleesi


Not a problem, I was extremely confused going back over my posts trying to figure that one out , I'm going on 5 hours of sleep in two days here....

I appreciate the apology , Though not needed, we all get a little passionate about our political views on occasion myself definitely not excluded.

I don't HATE Trump, I don't hate anyone, I vehemently disagree w the man and don't trust him lol but I don't hate him....

But yes I have been very vocal from the start about it , so I can understand your assumption

Thank you again



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 11:58 AM
link   
this is again dangerous territory, having factions in the military or SS etc.

if those SS members got relieved because of their political agenda, then so must those special ops flying the Trump flag.

it should be one fight, one nation, one flag when it comes to military, police, or SS branches. Our enemies are watching now more than ever. a military in disarray is a vulnerable military. grudges are one of the many factors for infiltration.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 12:16 PM
link   
You guys are way off target on this.
It was cyber security personnel.

Buck



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner

So what you are saying, is that you think it is appropriate to swear an oath that could, one day, make you complicit in crimes against the people, by way of your preventing a just removal of a tyrant? What manner of freedom hating bastard would take that job?


Why don't you ask the hundreds of thousands that have done just that . Many presidents have issued orders that were indeed war crimes.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 01:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Sheye
Gateway Pundit which was about the only outlet that originally reported on this has issued an update calling this fake news.

Gateway Pundit


UPDATE: REPORT DENIED: Secret Service Managers Fired, Escorted from White House Grounds
Kristinn Taylor Feb 3rd, 2017 12:47 am 611 Comments

UPDATE: The Secret Service has branded the report by reporter Steve Clemons that at least two managers were forced to resign overnight as “absolutely false”, the Washington Examiner reported. Friday morning.

Clemons corrected and clarified his reports to now state that officials with White House cyber security were forced out. His new tweets have been added at the end of this article.

“The report regarding the Secret Service personnel is absolutely false,” an agency spokeswoman said Friday.

She referred all further questions to the White House press office, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment.



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 03:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldtimer2
a reply to: Xcathdra

Oh really?,my sister was a SS agent,also head administrator,her duty was to protect whomever they were ordered to protect which meant to be a shield,so yes that is their duty,funny how some libs become instant attys,and my brother in law worked for them as well,how he met my sister,do your job and you won't get fired


as my post stated.

Since this has been confirmed fake news the point is now moot.
edit on 3-2-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2017 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Thanks for the update. I was wondering why nobody was picking this up. I checked this guys twitter before I posted. He had multiple posts and was specifically saying SS managers. He may have just blown his career.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join